Summer Mercato 2019
Milan are open to selling Laxalt to Parma on loan with obligation to buy for €12M. They need to overcome the wages hurdle as the player currently earns €1.8M which is not within Parma's reach [@NicoSchira
]
(08-09-2019, 08:22 PM)LaChDaNaN Wrote: Hakan as a back up, is a luxury that Milan can afford. According to transfermarkt the player valued at 20M. So already he is cheaper than he cost to the club. If he stays as a 4th or 5th solution in CM's then in one year he will be valued on the same site less than 12.. and in reallity non will offer an 8 digit number in order to get him.. this will lead him to follow the footsteps of Bertolacci, leaving as a free player after 2-3 years.

Since the club doesn't seem to have a plan with an increase role for the Turk, then he is a must-sell in order to reduse the loss. For the role that he will have, it is better to bring one prospect that maybe in 1-2 years can claim a role in the team than to keep him and basically burn him. 

Same thing stands for Silva.

If this is true, then we can put a cross over Milan and bury the club. If Milan can not have a 20mil player on the bench, then we are doomed. That means that 20mil players are starters and 5mil players are on the bench. With that set up, we can be sure to be 10th every year. 
Of course, that's where we were for a few years.

Needless to say, I completely disagree with you. Milan can 100% keep Hakan as a back up/rotation. It's not a problem, imo. And it's very likely to happen actually. I don't see Hakan leaving.
(08-10-2019, 04:52 AM)nefremo Wrote: If this is true, then we can put a cross over Milan and bury the club. If Milan can not have a 20mil player on the bench, then we are doomed. That means that 20mil players are starters and 5mil players are on the bench. With that set up, we can be sure to be 10th every year. 
Of course, that's where we were for a few years.

Needless to say, I completely disagree with you. Milan can 100% keep Hakan as a back up/rotation. It's not a problem, imo. And it's very likely to happen actually. I don't see Hakan leaving.

You said it yourself that we need to offload some players. In your opinion we should sell Gigio.. In order to fund correa and one more move.

In my opinion Donnarumma and Romagnoli are the only players of the current roster that deserve to wear the shirt of Milan.

You suggesting to sell one of them in order to buy some mediocrity, in the same time clubs like Fiorentina (Chiesa) , Torino (Belotti)  and even Sassuolo (Berardi) refusing to sell their best players. In order Milan to return, needs more players like Gigio and less players like Hakan.

Don't see only the season 2019-2020.. take into mind and the next season.. Before one year we were saying that taking as back up's Laxalt and Castigello.. was good decision.. now we are trying to sell them and we can't find any club that wants them. In order team to change status doesn't need 20M's in the bench but 50M's in the starting XI. You have to take into considaration that we have less games this season since we don't partitipate in a European Competition. 

Finally, it seems that A.C. Milan will play with DM Bennacer, CM Kessie - Paqueta at least if any other transfer won't be made in midfield with back ups, DM Biglia, CM Krrunic - Bonaventura, so Hakan isn't a bench player but a stand one..
(08-09-2019, 05:03 PM)nefremo Wrote: I don't want us to sell Donnarumma just to buy Correa. I don't think we need to, is my point. Correa is not THAT expensive at 40-45mil.

If we are selling Donnarumma to fund a market move, it better be someone a lot bigger then Correa.

WHERE in that post am I suggesting to sell Donnaruma in order to buy Correa and "one more move"????

Read again buddy! Then talk.

Also, what do you mean with "Hakan won't be a bench player, but a stand one"? Genuine question here, because I really don't know what that means. And you forgot Suso. Hakan can be Suso's sub (ACM's sub).
First, chill out bro.. we both want Milan to be challinging for trophies and not just to battle in order to survive. Smile

(08-10-2019, 11:36 AM)nefremo Wrote: WHERE in that post am I suggesting to sell Donnaruma in order to buy Correa and "one more move"????

Read again buddy! Then talk.

You had suggested that some post earlier.

(08-09-2019, 05:33 PM)nefremo Wrote: I think as things stand, we need 2 signings. 1 SS (starter) and 1 CM (this could be a rotational player).

Hwever, if Suso also leaves, then we either need another starting CM (so that we can push Paqueta to ACM full time) OR we simply need a starting ACM to take over from Suso.

Players, that if sold, don't need to be replaced:
- 1 of Castillejo/Borini (if both sold, then another CF will be needed)
- 2 of Laxalt/RR/SStrinic
- Donnarumma (I put him here because he would't have to be replaced as a starter since Reina is here. But I don't trust his brother as a back up so we would probably need to get a back up GK)

(08-10-2019, 11:36 AM)nefremo Wrote: Also, what do you mean with "Hakan won't be a bench player, but a stand one"? Genuine question here, because I really don't know what that means. And you forgot Suso. Hakan can be Suso's sub (ACM's sub).

He won't be in the bench but in the stands..

Anyway, we don't take decisions.. just writing our thoughts. In my opinion the team will benefit if they sell Hakan with a bit arround 15-20M and invest this money to loan/buy Rakitic for instance. He is a surplus in Barcelona and he is already 31. And until now there aren't a lot of teams interest in him..
Or invest the money to buy one very good prospect..

Calhanoglu, doesn't increase the quality of the team. Suppose that you have made one transfer in CM's and a week later Hakan suffers one serius injury and will be miss the season, would you buy another CM? no..
so better sell him now that you can take some money, in order to invest in other players that are going to help either immediately (something like Rakitic) or one talent for the future.
€60 million cash only is our asking price for Donnarumma. Keylor Navas and Andriy Lunin mentioned as possible replacements.
If we were to sell Donnarumma why the heck we offloaded PLizzari. ?
(08-10-2019, 01:22 PM)Arildonardo Wrote: €60 million cash only is our asking price for Donnarumma. Keylor Navas and Andriy Lunin mentioned as possible replacements.

We must ask for Areola in exchange for Donna. Areola+50M for Donna so that we don't have to waste money on Goalies.
Make Milan Great Again Okmilan
(08-10-2019, 01:38 PM)Rishav kant Wrote: We must ask for Areola in exchange for Donna. Areola+50M for Donna so that we don't have to waste money on Goalies.

Pretty sure PSG would value Areola at more than €10 million.
Looks doubtful Parma will buy Laxalt because it's too expensive. That's one big place we fucked up is giving players big contracts so they can sit on them

also wanna point out I'm not blaming Laxalt in this case but there have been past players who did such