Milan to leave San Siro
New shared stadium is gaining more momentum, if Elliott are not willing we need new owner who is willing to build our own, this is almost bad enough to make me against Elliott.

Remember, stadium cost is not subject to FFP.
Reply
(03-26-2019, 12:41 AM)reza Wrote: New shared stadium is gaining more momentum, if Elliott are not willing we need new owner who is willing to build our own, this is almost bad enough to make me against Elliott.

Remember, stadium cost is not subject to FFP.

I'm not completely against it... as long as it's our stadium.
They rumours were that we would own the vast majority of it
Reply
The problem is I don't see the powers that be allowing two new stadiums
Reply
(03-26-2019, 12:52 AM)porcho Wrote: I'm not completely against it... as long as it's our stadium.
They rumours were that we would own the vast majority of it

We share but we own more of it than Inter? This is as likely as Messi to Milan Big Grin
I have no idea who made this rumour, Suning are not poor and have no reason to agree to such thing.

(03-26-2019, 01:07 AM)AC_Troy Wrote: The problem is I don't see the powers that be allowing two new stadiums

Well may be, this is only to maximize revenue for the team. It happens we have more money, it doesn't happen we will be poorer. It's that simple. Much like the Roma project who ever owns Milan and Inter should push for separate stadiums.
Reply
(03-26-2019, 01:45 AM)reza Wrote: We share but we own more of it than Inter? This is as likely as Messi to Milan Big Grin
I have no idea who made this rumour, Suning are not poor and have no reason to agree to such thing.


Well may be, this is only to maximize revenue for the team. It happens we have more money, it doesn't happen we will be poorer. It's that simple. Much like the Roma project who ever owns Milan and Inter should push for separate stadiums.

They can push but it isn't gonna happen.  I love the idea of a new privately owned stadium but I don't want to share with Inter.  Still a better idea than renovating San Siro
Reply
(03-26-2019, 01:45 AM)reza Wrote: We share but we own more of it than Inter? This is as likely as Messi to Milan Big Grin
I have no idea who made this rumour, Suning are not poor and have no reason to agree to such thing.


Well may be, this is only to maximize revenue for the team. It happens we have more money, it doesn't happen we will be poorer. It's that simple. Much like the Roma project who ever owns Milan and Inter should push for separate stadiums.

Yeah, I don't disagree. it's a little weird.

(03-26-2019, 01:59 AM)AC_Troy Wrote: They can push but it isn't gonna happen.  I love the idea of a new privately owned stadium but I don't want to share with Inter.  Still a better idea than renovating San Siro

Thats just it...
the ideal would be a new privately owned stadium.
New privately owned stadium of our own > shared privately owned stadium > A new City owned shared stadium > Renovating the San Siro

They're all the rumored options in preference order.  Sagrin
Reply
(03-26-2019, 02:25 AM)porcho Wrote: New privately owned stadium of our own > shared privately owned stadium > A new City owned shared stadium > Renovating the San Siro

Agreed
Reply
Inter CEO Alessandro Antonello has claimed that it is the right time to move forward with plans for a new San Siro.
Inter and Milan have been working on a new stadium to replace San Siro, and Antonello confirmed the city rivals were putting the final touches to their vision for the venue. 
“We’ve been working on this project with Milan and we believe that a stadium we both own would be crucial for the our growth,” he told Sky Sport Italia
Reply
I would have mixed opinions about moving stadium. If i said no people would be certain to say that is sitting back and falling behind other Clubs around Europe.
Reply
Inter's new stadium

Reply