As it's been said before.....where is the proof that Leipzig buys cheap just to turn a profit later? I believe it's been established they've only done that with Keita, and who can blame them for turning a huge profit there while remaining competitive?
So to suggest that this will happen at Milan?...I don't understand where that notion comes from...
There is a difference between Udinese and RB Leipzig. Udinese is not an ambitious club. All they wanna do is be safe in mid-table and profit off the players sales. Leipzig on the other hand has an ambition of being a top club in their league (something they've achieved), all while doing it efficiently without burning through millions. Absolutely nothing wrong with that. The quicker we get to self-sufficiency, the better. I believe this Rangnick/Leipzig model can be a pathway to that.
In buying South American, African, Eastern European, Belgium, etc, etc, (you name it) instead of Italian...I don't see the problem. The key is quality. If I can get the same quality player from Belgium for 5mil, whereas in Italy it'll cost me 15mil...why the heck wouldd I buy the Italian? Ideally, the Italians would be better integrated, know the language, culture, league, etc....but at the end of the day, the game is so global these days that Italians might actually have a harder time integrating into a team in their own country (seeing as how many foreign players are there to begin with).
I don't care about the nationality. As long as the player checks all other boxes, this is irrelevant to me.