Winter mercato 2021
Duarte is the example that we should abandon cheap type of signings from Brazil.
Forza Diavolo ale!!!
(12-03-2020, 09:19 PM)Sleeping Giant Wrote: Duarte is the example that we should abandon cheap type of signings from Brazil.

how about the expensive type of signings from Brazil? like Lucas Paqueta?  Icon_lol2
A player that is bought but rarely features even when new, even when healthy. Those kind of spots should be reserved for own developed players not random signings.
If you see errors accessing the site contact me, see email below, with as much info as possible, thanks
[Image: wL3iQMT.png]
(12-03-2020, 09:28 PM)reza Wrote: A player that is bought but rarely features even when new, even when healthy. Those kind of spots should be reserved for own developed players not random signings.

theo giampaolo days?

rebic?

leao?
(12-03-2020, 09:25 PM)ACM2020 Wrote: how about the expensive type of signings from Brazil? like Lucas Paqueta?  Icon_lol2

Icon_lol2  

I would prefer it from European Clubs(<10M) examples like Hauge, Villar, Boga(costed Sas some 3M), Muldur they are so many in Serie A
Forza Diavolo ale!!!
(12-03-2020, 09:31 PM)Sleeping Giant Wrote: Icon_lol2  

I would prefer it from European Clubs(<10M) examples like Hauge, Villar, Boga(costed Sas some 3M), Muldur they are so many in Serie A

we left all brazil and went to paqueta???
(12-03-2020, 09:28 PM)reza Wrote: A player that is bought but rarely features even when new, even when healthy. Those kind of spots should be reserved for own developed players not random signings.

I thought that you were hinting that this deal took place with a hidden motif (a non-sport one), like when it happened to Digao, Harvey Esajas. I read something about the involvement of Serginho in this deal.
(12-03-2020, 09:09 PM)ACM2020 Wrote: Who knows? if some crazy La Liga team is willing to pay 20M to take both off our hand, would you sell? Icon_lol2

With all seriousness, I am not totally against selling either or both of them in January. I don't think they have made any contribution so far, so an early replacement (i.e. January) would not hurt the continuity of the team, and would give the new guy more time and chances to settle in.

I also wouldn't mind taking Pobega back for Krunic. I don't see anything that Krunic can offer now, and if we think Pobega is the future, we should get him back now. Just giving him the minutes that we would give Krunic already will help him grow and develop.

I think at this stage 10m for both would be a stretch.  Devilol

(12-03-2020, 09:31 PM)Sleeping Giant Wrote: Icon_lol2  

I would prefer it from European Clubs(<10M) examples like Hauge, Villar, Boga(costed Sas some 3M), Muldur they are so many in Serie A

Yep. Seen plenty of examples time and time again of Brazilians for good $$$ that just aren't up to the task.
According to Calciomercato.com, the Serie A giants are already looking for potential Kjaer's replacements in the market. Paolo Maldini said in October the Rossoneri have a budget to sign at least one new player in the January window.

Schalke 04’s Ozan Kabak reportedly tops Milan’s transfer list for the winter transfer window. The Rossoneri are open to paying up to €15m to secure the services of the Turkey defender.

The first alternative, according to the report, is Mohamed Simakan, contracted with Strasbourg. Fiorentina’s Nikola Milenkovic is another possible transfer target even if La Viola are not eager to sell in January.

Hellas Verona’s Matteo Lovato and Kristoffer Ajer are also being monitored by the Diavoli.
La Gazzetta dello Sport reports Milan are not prepared to sell Hakan Calhanoglu in January, even if he won’t renew his contract at San Siro.


https://app.football-italia.net/#article...ecommended