I would love Pogba too 
!
Kovacic is similar to Montolivo (in style). But I do think that he has the potential to become a much better player. I would welcome him with open arms but how we use him (with or without Montolivo) will be the question. That obviously depends on who else is there in the midfield.
About Vazquez, i agree with you. He is more of an attacking line reinforcement than midfield. I like him as a player, but as you said, he can only play in certain systems and the players around him need to compensate for the way you use him. In a variation of 4-4-2/4-2-3-1/4-4-1-1, I would like the player behind the 1 to be more of a David Silva type (roam around more and focus more on possession and involved in the build up, so more of a midfielder) rather than Vazquez type (more of a support striker type and more interested in finishing up the move rather than getting involved in the build up). I think the difference is that a Silva type of player gives you the freedom to play another more expressive player in the midfield and you'll still have balance......while with Vazquez there you'll almost certainly have to play 2 defensive minded CMs (holders) behind him. You can have success with either way.....just my preference is the 1st because I believe that way you have more technical ability in the midfield (deeper positions too) and can control and dominate a game much more frequently.
Agree on Honda. I always wondered why no coach has tried him in the midfield yet. I don't think that he is a player of the highest quality, but he is useful and the last couple of months he has probably been 1 of our best players.
!Kovacic is similar to Montolivo (in style). But I do think that he has the potential to become a much better player. I would welcome him with open arms but how we use him (with or without Montolivo) will be the question. That obviously depends on who else is there in the midfield.
About Vazquez, i agree with you. He is more of an attacking line reinforcement than midfield. I like him as a player, but as you said, he can only play in certain systems and the players around him need to compensate for the way you use him. In a variation of 4-4-2/4-2-3-1/4-4-1-1, I would like the player behind the 1 to be more of a David Silva type (roam around more and focus more on possession and involved in the build up, so more of a midfielder) rather than Vazquez type (more of a support striker type and more interested in finishing up the move rather than getting involved in the build up). I think the difference is that a Silva type of player gives you the freedom to play another more expressive player in the midfield and you'll still have balance......while with Vazquez there you'll almost certainly have to play 2 defensive minded CMs (holders) behind him. You can have success with either way.....just my preference is the 1st because I believe that way you have more technical ability in the midfield (deeper positions too) and can control and dominate a game much more frequently.
Agree on Honda. I always wondered why no coach has tried him in the midfield yet. I don't think that he is a player of the highest quality, but he is useful and the last couple of months he has probably been 1 of our best players.