PDA

View Full Version : why don't we every have an assitant striker?


sam_3
03-12-2005, 21:48
Hi everyone,

As all of you can c our attack is filled with great strikers. But they are all strikers. Pippo, gila, vieri, and sheva are all world class but they are all strikers. We c that when we play sheva always goes back to become the 2nd striker although in my opinion he is the best striker from all of the rest. I would want 2 c us with an assitant striker to play next to sheva and we can c sheva as a full striker. I think this would truelly improve our game. In some games we might need someone to create for the striker rather than scoring. I am talking about the type of players like baggio(i know im out of date :D ) , maybe cassano, recoba. sometimes i really wonder how sheva would be now adays if the other attacker provided 4 him instead of the other way around. I remember in 2001 when we got him when use to play as a full striker he was really scarey. He is still scarey but he is working more 4 the team now which is great, but what if someone else was to provide 4 him.

mk18
03-12-2005, 22:47
im sure cassano would come if we make something about it

slicknick
04-12-2005, 13:30
I would like to see Cassano as well, I wonder how likely it is for him to sign for us instead of Juve...

sam_3
04-12-2005, 16:18
I don't think cassano will ever come to milan. He wants capello and inter seems like the seconed option 4 him.

I wasn't talking about cassano in particular but anyone else with the same characteristics.

hitmannq8
04-12-2005, 21:08
Cassano man Cassano... another gem that will go to Juve or any other team and all we can do is watch and put on a fake smile... and say "We have Vieri"