View Full Version : Chelsea Football Club Discussion
BluezBruva
20-07-2006, 09:05
This thread is for talk of the Mighty Blues.. aka Chelski to other fans..
If you wana talk about the Chelsea team, transfers or even wana have a go at us i guess (but of course there shouldn't be many of these people) ;) haha
Anyway this is the place to talk about Chelsea.
Apperently next week we're signing Ashley Cole, World class left back (We've always had problems in this position) and today we had our new Home kit unvieled.
Dr Milano
20-07-2006, 09:28
This thread is for talk of the Mighty Blues.. aka Chelski to other fans..
If you wana talk about the Chelsea team, transfers or even wana have a go at us i guess (but of course there shouldn't be many of these people) ;) haha
Anyway this is the place to talk about Chelsea.
Apperently next week we're signing Ashley Cole, World class left back (We've always had problems in this position) and today we had our new Home kit unvieled.
ashley cole no way ... why would he switch from arsenal to chelsea ... :eek:
because he's not on the best of terms with Wenger and he feels that Arsenal betrayed him.
plus chelsea will probably offer him mega bucks
Kev Ryan
20-07-2006, 09:51
Jose Mourinho is a pure genious. Who would be capable of knowing that Ballack, Shevchenko and maybe A.Cole would improve a team. He really should be up there with the likes of Wenger and Fergie for his shrewed transfer activities. Wenger has probably spent less in his time at Arsenal (8 years I think) than Mourinho has spent on Shevchenko and Drogba alone. And let's not forget how quickly Chelsea become interested in every United or Arsenal target. Robben, Ballack, Essien, Duff and Mikel to name a few. Mourinho needs guidance from inferior managers such as Fergie and Wenger which amazes me considering he is supposed to be a great manager.
Thanks for giving us £16 Million for Mikel. He never even played for us and we got a nice tidy sum. A season on the bench at Stamford Bridge will be just what the doctor ordered for Mikel then if he's lucky he will go on loan for a season before moving to a crap team for good. Clever boy choosing Chelsea when he could have made it at United. Mourinho promised him he would play regular too and that has to be one of the funniest things I have ever heard. Mourinho wrecked his career just to stop him playing for United.
Kev Ryan
20-07-2006, 09:53
because he's not on the best of terms with Wenger and he feels that Arsenal betrayed him.
plus chelsea will probably offer him mega bucks
Cole didn't invite Wenger to his wedding recently.
rahul.acm
20-07-2006, 10:16
What? Somebody shoot me in the head! What is this ski thread doing in MM! Doesn't abramobitch have money to sponsor one!
BluezBruva
20-07-2006, 10:39
Well according to ALL the press over the last month they've said it's basicly a done deal. But saying that i'm not going to comment on him again playing for Chelsea untill he actually signs. I remember what happened with Steven Gerrard. He actually said he was leaving for us, and then had a U turn in the last minute!
So anything can happen in Football as we all know....
Dr Milano
21-07-2006, 18:07
Well according to ALL the press over the last month they've said it's basicly a done deal. But saying that i'm not going to comment on him again playing for Chelsea untill he actually signs. I remember what happened with Steven Gerrard. He actually said he was leaving for us, and then had a U turn in the last minute!
So anything can happen in Football as we all know....
By the word anything i think chelsea are gonna become corrupt
Well according to ALL the press over the last month they've said it's basicly a done deal. But saying that i'm not going to comment on him again playing for Chelsea untill he actually signs. I remember what happened with Steven Gerrard. He actually said he was leaving for us, and then had a U turn in the last minute!
So anything can happen in Football as we all know....
gerrard? ... try gallas, zambrotta, and if things remain the same add buffon to that list too ... :1whis:
No offense, but isn't there a Chelsea forum to talk about Chelsea? This is idiotic. I have no desire to go to a Chelsea forum to start a thread on Milan and cannot understand why you would want to do it here. What is the point? We don't care about your team of mercenaries. :firedev:
Dr Milano
22-07-2006, 05:42
No offense, but isn't there a Chelsea forum to talk about Chelsea? This is idiotic. I have no desire to go to a Chelsea forum to start a thread on Milan and cannot understand why you would want to do it here. What is the point? We don't care about your team of mercenaries. :firedev:
i agree a little with you but i mean i made a newcastle thread and stezaguard i think made a manchester united thread bluezbruva asked us politely first as well he mentioned it before soo i dont see much wrong with this thread ...
BluezBruva
22-07-2006, 07:26
Someone might aswel close this thread then.. thanks
rahul.acm
22-07-2006, 09:40
Someone might aswel close this thread then.. thanks
Dude I respect your patience and calmness but you have to realize that we just lost one of the most important player to you ( in a horrible manner). How do you expect all of us to sit down and discuss issues about chelsea. All the issues are sorted out with $$$$$! Continue being on this forum though!
i agree a little with you but i mean i made a newcastle thread and stezaguard i think made a manchester united thread bluezbruva asked us politely first as well he mentioned it before soo i dont see much wrong with this thread ...
Fair enough. As rahulacm pointed out, I guess it's different because of Sheva. I apologize for sounding harsh, bluezbruva. You're welcome here. :cheers:
Dr Milano
22-07-2006, 17:03
i hope chelsea get relegated next season lol then sheva will leave
keep this thread, or you can always use the 'swear at chelsea all you want here' thread in the flamers paradise section if you want :D
Josh-Sheva
29-07-2006, 14:16
Cmon, chelsea isa top class club. They have really good stars. BluesBruva, you are welcome to post, I recommend bigsoccer forums, they are good on chelsea,
Blue is the colour, football is the game... FORZA MILAN, CHELSEA
King tiger
29-07-2006, 15:03
You can buy players, but you cant buy tradition.
Josh-Sheva
29-07-2006, 15:05
great statement... but in order to have a great team you need great players....
to have a great team, its all about building up from a youth, finding good talent... i.e. kaka, gila...
chelsea on the other hand splash out millions on players who are already world class...i.e. sheva
its pathetic. its true money talks.
chelsea prediction aint gettin anywhere next season, man utd will win title, arsneal second and chelsea will only get to quarter final of CL where they meet milano and kaka scores hat trick! :510: :haha:
then from there we'll win it :p283:
Billy1969
30-07-2006, 14:42
Chelsea? Is that the little team in London that never won anything before that Russian maffia boss took over? Bleh, post that in the shiatteams thread, k thx.
BluezBruva
06-08-2006, 10:41
Sorry i haven't posted in a while i've been on holiday. Also i respect the Sheva situaton and i can understand why most people do hate us anyway.. lol!! A Chelsea flaming thread, :r14: well....
Na i understand and thanks for the welcome.
Dr Milano
06-08-2006, 11:05
Sorry i haven't posted in a while i've been on holiday. Also i respect the Sheva situaton and i can understand why most people do hate us anyway.. lol!! A Chelsea flaming thread, :r14: well....
Na i understand and thanks for the welcome.
no problem welcome back
Chelsea? Is that the little team in London that never won anything before that Russian maffia boss took over? Bleh, post that in the shiatteams thread, k thx.
Maybe you could show a bit of the politeness BB has shown the rest of us.
Milan_Mad
06-08-2006, 12:20
Chelsea lost there 1st pre season game 1-0 :respect:
rahul.acm
06-08-2006, 12:43
Chelsea lost there 1st pre season game 1-0 :respect:
Thats awesome news! I hope they lose the community shield match too! :ilol:
Dr Milano
06-08-2006, 12:46
Thats awesome news! I hope they lose the community shield match too! :ilol:
yeah but liverpools manager is very good indeed Rafael is a genious who knows how to spend and build a squad as for mourinho he is an idiot ... just look at his hair cut lol
Liverpool haven't played well at all in their pre-season friendlies, so i should imagine Chelsea will win.
zZ[-_-]Zz
06-08-2006, 12:54
i wouldn't say Rafael is a genious... true he has done well... but Crouch? my goodness...
KingHenry®
06-08-2006, 14:48
just look at his hair cut lol
lol nice one hahah
When Mourinho first came here and he was wearing that big coat in the winter, my dad thought it was a second hand charity coat that he was wearing to raise awareness for charities etc. When i told him it was worth about £3000, he couldn't believe it, he said it made Mourinho look like a tramp ! :D
Milan_Mad
06-08-2006, 16:34
Liverpool haven't played well at all in their pre-season friendlies, so i should imagine Chelsea will win.Yep they have played horrible, losing 5-0 to fc mainz with near enough a full strength team. They just have no quality in the team
Do you judge a whole team by pre-season results ?
No quality ? hahaha :ilol: Thanks for making me laugh with your inaccurate comment :D
Milan_Mad
07-08-2006, 13:06
Do you judge a whole team by pre-season results ?
No quality ? hahaha :ilol: Thanks for making me laugh with your inaccurate comment :DWho do u support Liverpool or Milan??
Whats wrong with you, the only quality they have is gerrard. Get over it
Actually i've supported Liverpool for about 20 years, so i'll get over nothing thank you.
They have more quality than just Gerrard.
Dr Milano
07-08-2006, 17:06
Actually i've supported Liverpool for about 20 years, so i'll get over nothing thank you.
They have more quality than just Gerrard.
hmmmm are you a scouscer dont take that offensive by the way im a scaly ... i enjoyed it when
Ferdinand scored against you ... that was awesome cant wait till you meet Man U and they beat you bad
I just don't think Liverpool is on the same level of any of the top teams in Europe. While I heartily congraduated their success 2 years before in CL, I consider it as a mere fluke. Having said, though, I still have great respect for Liverpool who has won 5 CL in history.
If I had to pick a team in the EPL to support, it would definetely be Liverpool. They are by far the classiest team in England. Even though I hate the SOBs for beating us in Istanbul and causing one of the worst days of my life, I admire their fighting, never give up spirit shown in both that CL Final and the FA Cup final.
rahul.acm
08-08-2006, 01:10
Liverpool - (Gerrard + Alonso + Reina + Hyypia) = :grinser:
I think by taking one the first one is already bad enough.
hmmmm are you a scouscer dont take that offensive by the way im a scaly ... i enjoyed it when
Ferdinand scored against you ... that was awesome cant wait till you meet Man U and they beat you bad
No, i'm not a scouser Dr M. Shame you weren't good enough to beat us in the F.A. Cup :D
Jeff, why was their CL win a 'mere fluke' ? People say the same about our win in 2003 against Juve and what about how we've scraped past teams in the semi finals against Inter, Ajax and PSV ? They can all be considered flukes. Are the times we've been beaten flukes also ? The times when we've capitulated and got beat by Deportivo and Barca ? You can't just label a particular match a fluke because the result didn't go the way you wanted.
I'm not going to take over this Chelsea thread by talking about Liverpool too much, so i'll just say that they have quality, can pass the ball as good as anyone at times and have done well on a tight budget. They're not the best, they're not at the top but they've been getting results, which in the end is all that counts.
Jeff, why was their CL win a 'mere fluke' ? People say the same about our win in 2003 against Juve and what about how we've scraped past teams in the semi finals against Inter, Ajax and PSV ? They can all be considered flukes. Are the times we've been beaten flukes also ? The times when we've capitulated and got beat by Deportivo and Barca ? You can't just label a particular match a fluke because the result didn't go the way you wanted.
Far from it, Jim, far from it.
I consider this game against Liverpool and PSVl that are mere flukes.
Winning against Juve is no luck; the situation is very similar to the one we have seen in the world cup when Italy played against France; only that both have scored a goal each instead of 0-0. I think both teams fight until the end and thankfully the better team won. Had Juventus done it, they deserved it too and it's no mere luck.
Yes I agree that winning against PSV is very very lucky.
The game against Inter: Milan was seriously seldom troubled by INter attack until Costacurta kicked the ball backward and we all knew what Martin did. Overall, Milan's defense against INter was almost perfect. No luck involved. Perhaps the only luck is the rule that we won on away goal; but in my humble opinion Milan put in a much more convincing performance than the headless Inter.
Against Ajax always give me the emotion; you can say that Milan is lucky but at the same time it's not. Inzaghi (and the rest of the team) fought really hard until the very end. This game differs from the one liverpool played against Milan, or so it seemed: Milan was fighting for 90 minutes to get the result; while LIverpool fought for 6 minutes to get the equalizer and 114 minutes to defend the draw. I hope there is a clear distinction there.
Against Depo I didn't watch the match at all, so I wouldn't comment.
Sadly, we are thoroughly beaten by Barca.
A word before I turn to the final against Liverpool: I don't know where you get the contention that winning PSV or Ajax or Inter shall be considered mere fluke or losing to Depo is a sheer bad of luck. You have come up with these arguments and I try to counter each of this match, except perhaps the game against Depo which I didn't watch.
Now why against Liverpool is a mere fluke: 1) Milan is sleeping for 6 minutes, and get punished by 3 goals. You don't see this happen very often in football; in fact, I don't see it happen at all for so long in my life in one of the top games in history. I can tell you that Real Madrid probably fell asleep for 45 minutes while there was still no goal. Of course one may imagine that LIverpool has the fighting period; but if you re-watched the game again as I did, you'll realize that Liverpool does NOT really have that. They don't have the winning mentality. Why? I'll tell you again in latter point.
2) If Milan is sleeping for 6 minutes, then they have been attacking for 114 minutes. This has 2 significance: 1) It can be inferred that Milan is not really sleeping for that 6 minutes. If your team collapsed for 6 minutes and conceded 3 goals, do you still expect them to attack the opponent (who just scored 3 goals). IT doesn't sound likely; it sounds more like the case that liverpool should have killed Milan in regular time: 4-3 or 5-3 or something. But it didn't. 2) What can you tell about LIverpool's mentality? THat's right. They come here for a draw. From the very first minute. Once they got 3-3, what did they do? I try to tell myself that I"m only consoling myself but that's not the case; Liverpool has seldom troubled Milan at all during the game except for the 6 minutes, just to be plain honest.
3) As expected, during half time I told my friend that Liverpool will now throw in high ball in the hope that someone will get it. That's how the first goal is scored. That's fine; no luck. The second goal you got everyone napping and Dida making a blunder; ok no luck. Then you got a penalty (because Gattuso was punished for whatever the reason is), GOT SAVED, and scored again. The ball, upon being saved, went RIGHT INTO the foot of the penalty taker; it could have gone to row Z, behind, or any other place, but it went RIGHT INTO the foot of the penalty taker.
Of course, I'm not saying that luck is not important. It is important, and luck is sometimes with you; sometimes against you. It's hugely disappointing, of course, but this is how a one-league game supposed to be. And by winning in that way, Liverpool has succeeded in coming back from 3-0 deficit; what people don't see is that they did exactly what the newspaper condemned italian football: that is, defensive football.
It's interesting how people say Italian play defensive football which, in the end, it's the team that defends for 114 minutes that won.
And to this, I will discard whatever we have discussed here, since this is a Chelsea thread.
Dr Milano
08-08-2006, 09:49
[QUOTE=Jim_UK]No, i'm not a scouser Dr M. Shame you weren't good enough to beat us in the F.A. Cup :D
REPLY TO Jim _Uk -------------------------------------------------------
hey jim you guys are lucky matey ... i knew you were going to mention the fa cup though lol in the game i was actually supporting liverpool i dont like man u but know im starting to like man u more than you guys and no the champo league isnt the reason its just ive seen many ignorant fans
Why is it everytime Liverpool win it's down to luck or a fluke, but when the other team wins it's because they're a better team. I think people who consistently use this excuse are the ignorant ones Dr M.
I guess its me and Jamie vs. the world here. Just because Liverpool doesn't win convincingly or beuatifully doesn't mean they don't deserve to win. They are scrappy. They take their opprtunities when they come and they don't allow the opposition to get many opportunities. A good team needs to do that too. I will be rooting for Liverpool to finally topple Chelski and win the EPL.
maybe I didn't watch enough of Liverpool game; but when you lose in a friendly 5-0 (and then of course beating another with 4-1) then I don't think they are 'that' consistent. And, if they are really that consistent, I think thye'll be closer to Chelsea at the top of the table. Instead....
Anyway, back to the topic.
Chelsea beat Feyenoord 1-0 yesterday. Lampard scored. Pierre Van Hoyjdonk (sp?) hit the post in the last minute.
Dr Milano
09-08-2006, 09:10
Why is it everytime Liverpool win it's down to luck or a fluke, but when the other team wins it's because they're a better team. I think people who consistently use this excuse are the ignorant ones Dr M.
sorry thier matey im not ignorant i never want to be ... im sorry man :googly: if you felt i was their
kaka's girl
09-08-2006, 10:23
Is anyone here Chelsea fan? , I hope the answer is :NO NO and NO , because they are too haughty
Stezagud
09-08-2006, 12:37
Jeff, as a Utd fan i dont really want to defend Liverpool ;) but in the 5-0 defeat from what i've read last week they were 0-0 at half time while fielding a strong XI, before making 7 changes and conceding 5 in the second half. Any side making that number of changes is never going to stay consistent against half decent opposition.
Dr M i didn't think you were being ignorant at all :)
Like i said, the only people who i find ignorant are the ones who use the argument of being lucky all the time. No matter what you say to them, they'll reply 'oh, you were just lucky'. Constantly again and again, those are the ignorant ones.
BluezBruva
11-08-2006, 11:20
We're looking sharper now. I'm saying this to take the michael ok. But Sheva seems to have good vision aswel a good goal threat doesn't he. He should be very useful with this sbility and we should see him near the top of the assit tables if he does this consistantly.
You guys have obviously seen Shev play more then me, but is he a very good team player, who has a good vision in the last 3rd of the pitch or what?
Jeff, as a Utd fan i dont really want to defend Liverpool ;) but in the 5-0 defeat from what i've read last week they were 0-0 at half time while fielding a strong XI, before making 7 changes and conceding 5 in the second half. Any side making that number of changes is never going to stay consistent against half decent opposition.
Thanks for the info.
Jim_UK: I have already stated when are the situations when I consider lucky and when is not in previous post. While I hate admitting it, football involves luck; I hope that I never give you (and the rest of the reader) that when Milan loses, it's always unlucky, or when Milan wins, it's always skill. If you have gotten this dichotomous thinking because of my poor explanation, I apologise.
God is fair, but not so fair. How I dream about the Chelsea owner has decided to buy Sheffield Wednesday instead of Chelsea. But it never happens. Isn't it luck in the first place that Chelsea got such an owner, got a turn of fortune all of a sudden? Other explanations can of course be put forth, an certain explain, but after many expereince of success and failure on my own, I realize that timing is important; and timing always come with luck. Sometimes you are lucky, sometimes you are not. It depends on whether you are ready to take the chance when the timing has come. To me, they compromise. But, luck plays the major role sometimes.
My conclusion: Harsh Reality.
Dr Milano
11-08-2006, 17:12
Dr M i didn't think you were being ignorant at all :)
Like i said, the only people who i find ignorant are the ones who use the argument of being lucky all the time. No matter what you say to them, they'll reply 'oh, you were just lucky'. Constantly again and again, those are the ignorant ones.
this reminds me off my brother ... :5schal: tell you the truth he is a man u fan and i tell him that milan are better as we won champions league 6 times you guys 2 .. and then i say we have kicked you out of champions league 4 times our recent victory 2 - 0 and all he says it was cheat cheat cheat ... cause gattuso fouled ryan giggs ... come on how lame is that ... :delol:
anyways Nice one Jim lol
zZ[-_-]Zz
11-08-2006, 23:28
the Russian billionaire was decidin' to buy a London club... he was decidin' between Spurs & Chelsea... and pick Chelsea simply because they were playin' in Europe... at least that's what i read ages ago & my friend (a Spurs supporter) verified it... and while he is disappointed back than when it first happened... he is actually very happy now that it never happened...
Zz']the Russian billionaire was decidin' to buy a London club... he was decidin' between Spurs & Chelsea... and pick Chelsea simply because they were playin' in Europe... at least that's what i read ages ago & my friend (a Spurs supporter) verified it... and while he is disappointed back than when it first happened... he is actually very happy now that it never happened...
I don't support any English club, but just curious, why is your friend happy?
I would be very happy if Berlusconi used 1% of his money to buy Torres, Sneijder...:D
kaka's girl
12-08-2006, 04:07
Anyone here luvs Spurs? In Premiership , they're my fav. team .I love Jermain Defoe .SO sad he couldn't play at 2006 World Cup
zZ[-_-]Zz
12-08-2006, 04:21
my friend is happy simply because Spurs is doin' very well with a limited budget... have a very youthful side... not detested by the rest of the world... rather than have an arrogant manager... play rather borin' football... only rejuvenated with big bucks...
KingHenry®
12-08-2006, 04:31
Zz']my friend is happy simply because Spurs is doin' very well with a limited budget... have a very youthful side... not detested by the rest of the world... rather than have an arrogant manager... play rather borin' football... only rejuvenated with big bucks...
it was so sad they missed out last year on the cl position. haha
But Spurs' limited budget is bigger than most clubs because of their Scandanavian backers. They're not mega rich but they have quite a bit of money to splash around.
it was so sad they missed out last year on the cl position. haha
more sad, I think they will miss this year too, even they have Shevchenko and Ballack:D.
I haven't ever thought Mourinho is a good coach. I extremely hate the way he talks and his tactic <defend, defend, bite 1 goal, defend, defend and wait to bite if they can:D, full time>. I hate most of chelsea squad, except for Cech:D.
I don't like any English club but I won't be bothered to support Leed when they play again English club <I won't be bothered if Milan crashs them too:D>
You guys have obviously seen Shev play more then me, but is he a very good team player, who has a good vision in the last 3rd of the pitch or what?
After Shevchenko went to London, I don't call him Sheva apart from talking about the past:D but I think Shevchenko will success in Premier League because English football has much space and high speed. So Shevchenko can dribble and do his long shots <one of the best long shoting strikers>. But I don't think he can success in Champion League anymore, Kaka, Pirlo are not behind him now:D.
KingHenry®
12-08-2006, 07:37
i dont think kaka is that far behind, i cant stand chelsea but i dont mind arsenal, arsenal has always been my second team, ive watched them since the good old ian wright days, its a great team just like milan, more like a family.
sleep i think differently i think shevchenko might struggle, the thing is if he struggles or he doesnt struggle i dont think hes going to enjoy it as much as he did in milan, back of hes mind and in hes heart he knows that milan was always hes greatest destination.
zZ[-_-]Zz
12-08-2006, 07:43
yes... Spurs' budget is bigger than most other clubs... but they do have a limit on wages & money for transfers... plus they also spend wisely... remember... it's the same team that bought Carrick ages ago for under 3 million & sold him off for about 18 million... likewise you do not see them fork out 6 million for Chimbonda when they could... not to mention they rejuvenated the careers of Robbie Keane... Mido... which i think is credible...
KingHenry®
12-08-2006, 08:40
i did not rate suprs much before, but now they are begginin 2 develop a great team
I watched Chelsea VS Celtic. Shevchenko played quite well with some good pass even he missed a chance when facing the keeper. But it's friendly, so I will wait to see in September:D
supreme: I just said Kaka was behind Shevchenko:D. AMF is behind Striker right:D. Maybe you thought I said Kaka played as low as Pirlo:D.
[QUOTE=Sleep]I watched Chelsea VS Celtic. Shevchenko ...QUOTE]
I bet not many people will be interested in $-$im, or Englishev.
seeing the way you <Jeff, Supreme> said after my post makes me assume that you think I like Shevchenko <I mean English learner:D>. I don't like him any more. In fact, I only started to like him because he was playing well for Milan. But I still hope he will success in Premier League <just Premier League>.
You'd be surprised Jeff, i think there is alot more interest in him than there appears.
The only Chelsea things i really like are Dennis Wise & Gustavo Poyet as these two are the new coaches of my home town football club. So far we've won 3 out of 3, but we are in league 2 ... so the standard isn't great :D
(For those not knowing the league structure it goes Premiership, Championship, League 1, League 2, Conference).
We may also have Paul Ince coming on as coach too, they may be old but a midfield of Wise & Ince would be great for us for a few games.
Like i said, this is the only affiliation i have with Chelsea :D
In the glorified friendly that is the Charity Shield, Liverpool won 2-1 against Chelsea.
Although slightly meaningless, it wasn't that friendly a game as Momo Sissoko rampaged through the entire Chelsea team tackling anything that moved ! At only 21 this guy is rapidly improving into one of the best defensive midfielders in the game. If Milan had someone like him, we'd be amazing.
Anyway, Chelsea weren't sharp enough due to less games and Liverpool were sharper due to more games, which makes sense.
It was painful to see Shevchenko in their team and then to see him score and hear all the pundits lap it up ... not to mention Abramovich jumping up and down when his new best mate scored for them, well done Roman, it's amazing what 3 years of tapping him up can do :fero:
KingHenry®
13-08-2006, 14:19
It was painful to see Shevchenko in their team and then to see him score and hear all the pundits lap it up ... not to mention Abramovich jumping up and down when his new best mate scored for them, well done Roman, it's amazing what 3 years of tapping him up can do :fero:
i dont kno what was more painful when sheva kissed hes cheslea top or when roman was jumping up and down throwing hes fist in the air. imho i think sheva is not as good as ppl thought hed be. a total waste of 30 mill haha
it was funny because at times he was getting frustrated at not being given the ball by his team mates .... and i was thinking, well you wouldn't have that problem with us would you ! :D
By the time he develops a decent understanding with the other players it'll be time for him to retire almost.
KingHenry®
13-08-2006, 14:37
it was funny because at times he was getting frustrated at not being given the ball by his team mates .... and i was thinking, well you wouldn't have that problem with us would you ! :D
By the time he develops a decent understanding with the other players it'll be time for him to retire almost.
lol so tru, remember when he was in the box and he got surrounded like by 4 or so liverpool players he got really angry, i know inside hes feeling y did he decide 2 move 2 england. yeh i think hes only got like another 3/4 years in him, was not a wise choice movin 4 cheslea
Dr Milano
13-08-2006, 16:19
i wanted chelsea to win today ... because of sheva i felt really really happy when he did score :dconf: but werent when he kissed the shirt ... Riise should be signed by milan lol WHAT A SHOT !!! WHAT A SHOT !!! Good Goal By Crouch Too
Hes Red And His Feet Stick Out Of His Bed :5roma:
Riise Goal would remain as one of my best goal i have ever seen in English Football, it's maradonesque goal, and it also reminds me of the Goal that Henry's Goal against Spud,
No Offense Kaka's new girl or any spud fan, IMO Spurs are most irritated team i have ever seen just like Juventus and Inter
Jamie, Sissoko is already becoming one of the best DM, he had a great game yesterday, What A Player!!!, he reminds me of Viera in his earlier years when he was playing for Arsenal.
Riise has scored some superb goals over the years, his left foot is like a hammer at times.
I agree with you about Sissoko Shomo. It's taken him a while to settle in, especially after he almost lost his sight last year, but since he came back he's been improving all the time. His passing, crossing, shooting still need improving which is natural when his game is more about the physical side of things. But the way he was just snapping up anything loose yesterday was fantastic ... even when the Chelsea player's had only slightly miss controlled the ball in midfield he was right in there.
This is why i'm more in favour of Milan getting a player like him to replace Seedorf. Someone like YaYa Toure, who's very similar in build but is better on the ball than Sissoko. For me it would just make our midfield so much more combative and aggressive.
Stezagud
14-08-2006, 10:41
I didnt think Riise's goal was as good as has been suggested, he ran far but was under no pressure at all and the shot should really have been saved by Cudicini ;)
I must admit im with Zlat on the whole Sheva issue too, it doesnt make much sense for him to have moved for money, its not as if Milan paid him peanuts :cool: i do believe it was a number of things, pressure from his wife to raise their children in an English speaking environment and also his own desire for a new challenge. I dont feel angry at him for moving but i am dreading him turning up at Old Trafford wearing blue :eek:
I think when you watch it for the first time, either live or on the highlights you would get caught up in it and think it was a superb goal.
But you're right Stez, if you analyse it correctly everyone does back off him and i guess Cudicini should have saved it. Saying that though the ball does dip quite significantly and how many games does Cudicini get to play now-a-days ? On top form he would have stopped it, but only playing now and again makes you rusty.
Would still love to see him at Milan though.
vBulletin® v3.7.1, Copyright ©2000-2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.