I think most people handled this debate topic well.
Let's just remember that football is an art and not a science. Opinions are almost by definition personal and subjective. If you like Sheva better, fine, if memories of Van Basten warms your heart more, that is fine too.
Even if discussions like this have a tendancy to never end, they can still add value by bringing up "supporting evidence" that all members are not aware of.
Back to the poll question: 1) As Johan pointed out, it makes little sense to vote for Sheva just because you never saw Van Basten play. Then not voting seem a better option. 2) Van Basten certainly got more international attention and recognition that Sheva has so far (3 player of the year awards if I am not mistaken).
I think we can all agree on one thing though, we want Sheva to leave a legacy bigger than Van Basten
Whether that is likely to happen or not is still up for debate.