Quote:
|
Originally Posted by cescvanpersie
Can we stop using Pato's age in every argument please??
It's quite easy for me to just say Fabregas is the best seeing as he is only 20 and is already very dominant.
---
the youngsters froma arsenall will be intimidated 100%
---
The same way they were intimidated when beating real madrid at the bernabeau? 
You can never judge these facts, just have to take the game as it comes. |
Ok dude.....Fabregas is GREAT we get it
but if you're questioning Pato's credentials then that's a bit way out. at 17 Pato Ripped the then kings of the world Barca apart....toying Puyol like if he was playing for fun....Cesc was brought in from Barca's youth academy at 16. So there's not much difference there especially if you consider that Fabregas was gradually brought to the forefront by Wenger while Pato was immediately thrown to the wolves as soon as he was allowed to drink
Fabregas was allowed to work under one of the best dm's in the world in Vieria. Pato- though initially played alongside the best striker ever....has had to fend for himself for most of this season with Ronaldo out. AND PATO IS STILL UP THERE WITH THE BEST.
So age IS surely a factor in that if all things are equal he should progress to become very good if not wrold class. I mean I could go on about his pace his first touch, dribbling skills, shooting ability and creativity but you already know about that
