Quote:
Originally Posted by GeoTav
Ballack would ask for a too high salary and he would probably want a 2 or 3 year contract. No way.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by rosoneri_11
Sorry mate but do you think that Pirlo and Dinho are so good that can bench Ballack and Pirlo. All of them Ballack,Petrov,Pirlo,Dinho are in the same level.
We don't need them, eccept if we want to sign some rubbish and not needed players from their top club.The thing that we are doing in the last 3 years.
Thats why we have that rubbish team.
|
I just said that would be OK, not good or great. Ballack's wage is high but he knows his condition now. 2 years for each of them is not bad. Ballack at most cost 8M for 2 years, Petrov 4-5M and no transfer fee, this money of course is going to be paid part by part (mean the reserved amount for wage could be invested in other works). When you buy a new & good one, about 10M transfer and 4-6M for 2 years wage must be spent.
I still think Dinho is very good if he play at his position. There is no WC but player like him has his pride. Pirlo's passes are as precise as ever, but he couldn't dash 40m and score. How could he play if there are no movement around him, regardless of how accurate his passes are, they will be cut for sure.
Ballack & Petrov are both subs at their old club. Petrov < Dinho though faster. Ballack is not a true deeplying playmaker so he can be a sub there, be another Beckham or play at Seedorf's position.
I want Ganso, Hernanes, Dzeko,... but with
20M or even less, how could we spend?