Quote:
Originally Posted by Filipéz 182
offcourse people can make their own choice in doing this or not, I can fully understand.
But I am also doing this for some time now. normally I buy a new shirt every year, sometimes 2, same for my brother and some friends but not anymore the latest years.
But the biggest impact would be an almost empty san siro in a big game out of protest, and not only for 1 game but for a longer period. I saw many people protesting against silvio yesterday so that is a good start; I also saw some banners like "No transfers = No Abbonamenti"
|
Ahah, of course everyone can do whatever he wants ...
Actually, I'd like to have a reply about the first part of my post, because I think that by doing that, the situation could be summed up this way: there is a problem in the club, people find a solution, but the consequences of this solution can be worse than the initial problem (in this case: a revenue is cut, B&G sell Pato for example, when the boycott was done to force them to invest into new players). So it's not a good solution IMO. It goes against any logics and it's what I don't understand, I'd like if someone could give me explanations, because I presume that the people doing that would do it to have a better situation then and not a worse one.
PS: It makes me think about all the debates about having electric cars instead of cars using petrol/fuel/... to decrease pollution. Initially, it's a good solution, because there is no more pollution coming from the cars. But the problem can be worse actually as more electricity needs to be produced, and producing electricity is something polluting. It's exactly the same kind of problem/solution situation ...