Selling Kaka?

CHELSEA SEEMS DAMN INTRESTED IN KAKA. AND ROMAN ABRAHIMOVIC AT THE MOMENT IS LOOKING TO PAY OR GIVE ANYTHING TO GET THE SERVICES OF THE BRAZILIAN STARLET. ON OTHER HAND KAKA HAS CLEARLY SAID THAT HE WOULD PREFER MILAN OVER CHELSEA QUITE RIGHTLY FOR US (MILAN FANS).

http://www.goal.com/NewsDetail.aspx?...44020&idSez=20
NOW THERE ARE A FEW POSITIVES FROM SELLING KAKA TO CHELSEA:

1. WE CAN GET CRESPO OUT OF THIS LOAN BUISNESS AND SIGN HIM PERMANENTLY. THIS MEANS THAT WE GET CRESPO PLUS SOME MONEY ON WHICH WE CAN SIGN SOME ONE FOR KAKA'S POSITION. E.G VAN DER VAAT OR BALLACK BOTH OF THEM ARE NOT REALLY HAPPY WITH THEIR CURRENT CLUB'S.

2. THE MONEY WE GET WE CAN USE THAT ON BUYING RONALDINHO. THIS IS PROBABLY THE BEST OPTION. SINCE FOR ME RONALDINHO IS BETTER THEN KAKA. NOW THOSE OF YOU WHO ARE THINKING THAT IT WILL BE BETTER TO ASK BARCA FOR A SWAP OF KAKA AND RONALDINHO I WOULD SAY THAT SURLEY IS NOT GONNA HAPPEN BECAUSE BARCA KNOW'S THAT WHO CAN GET THE BETTER OF THIS MOVE. MOREOVER THE MONEY THAT ABRAHIMOVIC WILL GIVE FOR KAKA'S MOVE WILL BE MORE THEN MANY OF US HAVE THOUGHT ( IF WE ASK HIM FOR THAT MUCH) AND THERE IS NO NEED TO EXPLAIN WHY HE WILL PAY THIS MUCH. THE ONLY PROBLEM IN THIS WHOLE STORY IS THAT ARE BARCA LETTING RONALDINHO GO.

3. THE MOST POSSIBLE OPTION ASK FOR A KAKA AND LAMPARD SWAP. LAMPARD DOES NOT NEEDS TO BE INTRODUCED BUT IN SIMPLE WORDS HE IS A MATCH WINNER AND THERE IS NO DOBUT WHAT HE IS CAPABLE OF. HE MEANS TO CHELSEA WHAT KAKA MEANS TO MILAN.

WE MUST CONSIDER THE FACTOR THAT AT THIS STAGE WE NEED CRESPO BADLY. SINCE OUR GILARDINHO DEAL SEEMS TO BE OUT OF HAND. AND WHY? BECAUSE REAL MADRID LIKE ALWAYS ARE FANCYING THER CHANCES AND GILA'S HELPING THEIR CAUSE BY THIS TYPE OF STATEMENTS:
http://www.goal.com/NewsDetail.aspx?...44065&idSez=20