![]() |
|
|||||||
| Notices |
| View Poll Results: Dinho or others? | |||
| Toothy |
|
42 | 50.00% |
| Others |
|
42 | 50.00% |
| Voters: 84. You may not vote on this poll | |||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#20 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: 01 2004
Location: England
Fave Players: Maldini, Pirlo and rest of Milan
![]() |
Quote:
Then they also played too far apart with neither going forward far enough to support Wagner Love (and with Robinho almost non-existent a lot of the match, it's all the more harder). I'm sure Ancelotti could work them together better than both Dunga and Pareirra, but right now I'm a little afraid at the thought of risking so much money when they simply haven't performed together. However, should we get him, then I'd push him further forward into the supporting role (which he should be able to do well as he was a forward at the start of his career) and get him to use play on the ball far, FAR more quicker (yesterday he reminded me of Seedorf during the first half of the season). The fact is, at Milan the system has been built around Kaka and Pirlo in midfield, and Dinho coming in would mean he'll have to adapt into the system we play, rather than changing everything around. For games where we need to attack more, that supporting forward role is better for him, but for bigger matches (like CL), he will probably have to change his role to be similar to Seedorf, such as pushing out on the left (which he does often anyway) when defending and really working hard that side to make sure support is provided for the LB. This is another element that's difficult to predict, as he can provide defensive support to some degree, but it'll have to improve in our side. |
|
|
|
|