rt9

rt9 · 19-09-2008, 21:02

The bottom line is Gila was a flop at Milan. Wasnt his fault, wasnt the club's fault. He simpy did not fit our team. This is always a gamble that clubs take when buying players---there is no guarantee that a player would reproduce his form at his new club. Look at Henry for example, lousy at Juve, awesome at Arsenal, and average at Barca. Best example, Sheva---awesome with us, but could not fit the Chelsea system and was mediocre. Gila is doing well because of Prandelli, his old coach--which makes me think of another example, remember Crespo in his first spell at Chelsea? He was out of shape and out of form, after a few months with Carlo, he was back.

19-09-2008, 21:02	#11
rt9 Registered User Join Date: 05 2006 Location: Bangkok, Thailand Fave Players: marco van basten, rui costa, kaka, pirlo	The bottom line is Gila was a flop at Milan. Wasnt his fault, wasnt the club's fault. He simpy did not fit our team. This is always a gamble that clubs take when buying players---there is no guarantee that a player would reproduce his form at his new club. Look at Henry for example, lousy at Juve, awesome at Arsenal, and average at Barca. Best example, Sheva---awesome with us, but could not fit the Chelsea system and was mediocre. Gila is doing well because of Prandelli, his old coach--which makes me think of another example, remember Crespo in his first spell at Chelsea? He was out of shape and out of form, after a few months with Carlo, he was back.