mrki

mrki · 05-04-2010, 16:07

One more thing. My claim in here is that Milan is losing much by playing Pato as a RW. It is obvious that Pato scored all of his goals as a classic forward, from classic forward's positions. More, to use him on a RIGHT wing is simply absurde.

Is it possible that Hernanes can play AM behind Pato and a CF. Or is he too slow for playing as an attacking AM that can play vertical? In my oppinion people dont even know what Pato can do as a classic second striker with a good Cf next to him. Pato still hasnt showed his all and Milan can gain SO MUCH from Pato playing as a CF.

05-04-2010, 16:07	#11
mrki Registered User Join Date: 04 2005 Location: Croatia Fave Players: Maldini, Boban, Inzaghi	One more thing. My claim in here is that Milan is losing much by playing Pato as a RW. It is obvious that Pato scored all of his goals as a classic forward, from classic forward's positions. More, to use him on a RIGHT wing is simply absurde. Is it possible that Hernanes can play AM behind Pato and a CF. Or is he too slow for playing as an attacking AM that can play vertical? In my oppinion people dont even know what Pato can do as a classic second striker with a good Cf next to him. Pato still hasnt showed his all and Milan can gain SO MUCH from Pato playing as a CF. __________________ "Where others have succeeded, I have always failed..." Jacques Clouseau