AC Milan Forums  

Go Back   AC Milan Forums > AC MILAN > Games & Tactics

Notices

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 15-06-2005, 13:40   #16

Jim_UK

Registered User
 
Jim_UK's Avatar
 
Join Date: 07 2001
Location: England
Jim_UK is on a distinguished road
Sacchi/Capello's Milan would win fairly easily. Firstly the argument of pace was brought up, a young Maldini at left-back would be able to cope with Cafu, plus because Maldini got forward alot in his early days he would be able to put Cafu on the back foot (what a spectacle that would have been though ) Aside from Kaka and Shevchenko, there is no one else in our team with pace, Costacurta and Baresi would have been able to cope with them quite well. Why you ask ? Well, this leads to the next point, the ability to hassle and press the opposition. Sacchi/Capello's Milan were one of the best teams in the history of club sides to press the opposite team. Wherever the opposition went, there would be 2 or 3 players hounding them to force them into mistakes, this ability meant they didn't have a problem beating lower teams or the best teams. Yes the Milan of today could cope for a while, but we would eventually crack and back comes the mentality side of it. The pressure today's Milan would be under would be immense and it would be a constant pressure. Finally i think the old Milan would score more goals and from many different players, not just Van Basten. If Shevchenko doesn't score for us (this season particularly), then sometimes we don't score at all. I personally believe that they would have more options for getting a goal.

These things point to a win for the old Milan, for me anyway.
__________________
... Is watching you ...
Jim_UK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15-06-2005, 14:10   #17

MATNAT

Registered User
 
MATNAT's Avatar
 
Join Date: 05 2005
Location: Playboy Mansion
Fave Players: Miss July
MATNAT is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kui
Good point and knowledge of our history. While this team is very good, it is not like sacchi's milan. I think the biggest difference is this team does not have the formation balance that Sacchi had.
The thing that has been bothering me is the formation where Pirlo doesnt win the ball like Gattuso does. And Gattuso doesnt contribute to the offense as well as we would like. These guys if skills combined into one player would be something. To make up for Gattuso's offensive shortcomings we use Cafu as a overlapping wing which to me is inefficient play movement. While on the left we lack the defensive wing creativity. Seedorf is too central and really sucks on the wing while Maldini is not the same left back as he was in his younger years.
So Gattuso needs to be a bit like Pirlo, Pirlo a bit like Gattuso. Maldini should stay Central from now on, and we need to find a Cafu like player on the left. With such imbalance our team has formation wise I think our offense and defense has disturbing deficiency that is starting to come to light or we must finally come to admit. More balance like the Saccho team will see glory galore. There needs to be a lot of decision making in the summer break.

FORZA MILAN!
may i just say i made these kind of points in my "ancelotti out thread" yet most people jumped on my back without ever fully reading what i had written...

kui ur absolutely right.. this time soesnt ahve the balance between defence or attack adn is not resolute when it comes to "battening down the hatches" the team is too soft int he middle and this has been exposed far to often if ancelotti doesn`t do something it`ll be exposed once again during the coming season..

one thing you can say about sacchis or capellos teams were that they were never soft and never ever mentally unstable....



p.s im sure this post may encite some rage in someone....let the debate begin!!!

Last edited by MATNAT; 15-06-2005 at 14:13.
MATNAT is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15-06-2005, 17:39   #18

Mehdi

Registered User
 
Join Date: 12 2004
Mehdi is an unknown quantity at this point
Quote:
Originally Posted by Xudong
Not all Dutchmen. Kaka and Sheva are (at least almost) equivalent to Gullit and MVB. Only Rijkaard, IMHO.
No one is the equivalent of Van Basten. Kaka' has a long way to go before being compared to Gullit. Everyone in the World was scared of facing Gullit and Van Basten, only Shevchenko has that aura in the current side.
Mehdi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15-06-2005, 19:53   #19

MATNAT

Registered User
 
MATNAT's Avatar
 
Join Date: 05 2005
Location: Playboy Mansion
Fave Players: Miss July
MATNAT is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mehdi
No one is the equivalent of Van Basten. Kaka' has a long way to go before being compared to Gullit. Everyone in the World was scared of facing Gullit and Van Basten, only Shevchenko has that aura in the current side.
amen to that brother!!!
MATNAT is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19-06-2005, 00:02   #20

humanTORCH

Registered User
 
humanTORCH's Avatar
 
Join Date: 09 2002
Location: Near the EQUATOR!
Fave Players: Sheva,Zidane,Boban,MVB
humanTORCH is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by Xudong
there isn't much different except that:

Pirlo + Gattuso = Rijkaard.

So the current one is inferior to the old one because of one less player.
I tend to agree on you xudong, we lack a player like rijkaard in these current squad and I believe this is our weakness the opposition has exploited. I hope Ancelotti will solve this problem.
__________________
One time Van Basten said to me: Why do Milan keep winning while the others don't?
I answered: Marco, we want to remain in the memory as a side that wins in a certain way, we must entertain the public because it's just not the winning that counts.'
- Arrigo Sacchi
humanTORCH is offline   Reply With Quote
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 19:29.


Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.