Strictly! Men/boys paradise.

What do ya feel when ya see this pic?

nice isnt it?

will nata be impressed with these pics rae?

Originally Posted by Lombardia

will nata be impressed with these pics rae?

donno, she has not mentioned about it, so I follow the rule - what is not prohibited that is allowed

unningly movin ass form Brazil

Originally Posted by rae

What do ya feel when ya see this pic?

I personally feel that this pic crossed the line. This thread has allways, with your help Rae, celebrated female beauty. This pic is explicitly sexual in its nature and may not only offend, but also open the gates for more questionable postings. Let me know if you think I am wrong.

im not complaining

Well, Henrie... what should I say...nothing.... I am waitin for more opinions....if people think this pic is offencive one I will ask admins to remove it and if not...so....

Rae don't get me wrong, I am not offended. It would take a pic of horny dwarfs with a shaved skunk to do that

but I do think this thread should be about beauty and not sex.

Look at em, do you say that they are not beauties??? And what do you mean saying ''beauty not sex''???
Dont you think that those two statements are so closely related in men's conscious?!
Well, in other case I should say that not always we want to relate these thing together... sometimes we want peace, tranquility, stillness....but it happens not so often...
IMO sex and beauty of women is almost the same thing, though I can not decline other attitude...

Originally Posted by rae

IMO sex and beauty of women is almost the same thing

On that point we have to agree to disagree

Can you name the things that regales you in women that eventually is not related with sex???

You are missing my point. There is a considerable difference between Catherine Zeta Jones in a Dior evening gown, or even Ursula Andress in the famous Dr No scene, and a spread-eagled photo of a porn-star.

Sex and beauty are not remotely the same thing. Sexy and beautiful are also not the same thing, allthough some posess both qualities. My opinion is that this thread should celebrate female beauty. There are certainly enough site out there allready that exploit female sexuality.

Originally Posted by Henrik

You are missing my point. There is a considerable difference between Catherine Zeta Jones in a Dior evening gown, or even Ursula Andress in the famous Dr No scene, and a spread-eagled photo of a porn-star.

Sex and beauty are not remotely the same thing. Sexy and beautiful are also not the same thing, allthough some posess both qualities. My opinion is that this thread should celebrate female beauty. There are certainly enough site out there allready that exploit female sexuality.

Firstly Rae, I noticed that it might seem like I'm following you around MM, but I'm not

Now, to my main point, I agree with Henrik 100%. in fact, before you brought that argument, I didn't think it was possible to argue that. There is a CLEAR distinction between sex and beauty. And while yes, many men don't make too much of a distinction between sex and beauty, it seems that Henrik (I may be wrong ) and I do make a distinction. I was not offended, nor can I complain about that picture, very few men can resist, but I am one of those guys who prefer beauty over sex. I think it's a beautiful thing that women are......so..............beautiful.

So, while I wouldn't complain if you posted a few more of those pictures , I have to tell you that I always prefer beauty, believe it or not. Salma Hayek is beautiful, but Nelly Furtado and Charlize theron are even more-so .

i agree beauty > sex