Official: Klaas Jan Huntelaar - Page 21

OCmilano · 16-10-2010, 10:16

Quote:

Originally Posted by GeoTav

What's the point of all this topic ?
Comparing Ibra and Huntelaar ? Useless, Ibra is better than Huntelaar.

I wonder why nobody talks trash about Huntelaar, he does exactly like Gilardino: he struggled to score in Milan in his last year (well, for Huntelaar, it was also his first year), left and scores goals for both the NT and the new club ...

Everyone bashed Gilardino by saying he was weak mentally (too much pressure in Milan for him, etc), and for Huntelaar, the guy suddenly becomes a hero we should have kept ?

I will never understand ...

Without a doubt this is true. The reason why im sad/upset we sold him is because we kept Pippo, and B22 (until he decided to be traded) this is why I post on this thread.

H11 wanted to stay on this team and that gets my respect. After Ibra came he knew that he was 4th on the list of CF, so he left then.

And Fk Gila because that ahole got many starts and many chances and didnt do sht here. H11 no one with half a brain can say he got as many chances (starting/min) as B22 and Gila.

Forza Klaas

fLame · 16-10-2010, 15:52

Quote:

Originally Posted by OCmilano

Without a doubt this is true. The reason why im sad/upset we sold him is because we kept Pippo, and B22 (until he decided to be traded) this is why I post on this thread.

H11 wanted to stay on this team and that gets my respect. After Ibra came he knew that he was 4th on the list of CF, so he left then.

And Fk Gila because that ahole got many starts and many chances and didnt do sht here. H11 no one with half a brain can say he got as many chances (starting/min) as B22 and Gila.

Forza Klaas

With all due respect, Inzaghi is better than Huntelaar even at this age.
There were many times Huntelaar played for majority of the game and was invisible.
While Pippo creates a number of chances in 15 minutes.

Bottom line: Huntelaar is good, but not for our team.

Giorgos · 17-10-2010, 19:14

Quote:

Originally Posted by fLame

With all due respect, Inzaghi is better than Huntelaar even at this age.
There were many times Huntelaar played for majority of the game and was invisible.
While Pippo creates a number of chances in 15 minutes.

Bottom line: Huntelaar is good, but not for our team.

We could give him another chance...

Reza · 19-10-2010, 13:39

Everybody please take it easy on this subject. Don't get into personal stuff and insults

It is no secret that I rather not ban and ask all to use the ignore list if needed.

OCmilano · 19-10-2010, 15:43

Quote:

Originally Posted by fLame

With all due respect, Inzaghi is better than Huntelaar even at this age.
There were many times Huntelaar played for majority of the game and was invisible.
While Pippo creates a number of chances in 15 minutes.

Bottom line: Huntelaar is good, but not for our team.

Pippo has played with this team for much longer. Dont you think that helps?

So if you were the head coach you would like to keep a 37 yr old pippo over Huntelaar? Is your real name Allegri by any chance?

ACMILAN1983 · 20-10-2010, 03:26

Quote:

Originally Posted by OCmilano

Pippo has played with this team for much longer. Dont you think that helps?

So if you were the head coach you would like to keep a 37 yr old pippo over Huntelaar? Is your real name Allegri by any chance?

Pippo is willing to be 4th choice striker, something i doubt Huntelaar is.

mzk57 · 20-10-2010, 13:49

Quote:

Originally Posted by ACMILAN1983

Pippo is willing to be 4th choice striker, something i doubt Huntelaar is.

Instead of wasting money on the loser Robinho, ACM should have kept KJH & signed VdV or Honda etc. That would have been real smart business. Ibrahimovic + Robinho with no attacking/creative midfielder coming is simply foolishness. 2 so called big name strikers came in & all here went crazy and started dreaming of silverware. Now see Robinho is not even getting a chance to play & when he gets, he isn't doing anything special. If ACM had kept KJH & brought in, VdV, then all the Seedorf, Ronaldinho & Pirlo hatters would have been happy to see them out of the team & Ibrahimovic, Pato, KJH rotating as the forwards. But noooooooooooo .................. we got Robinho

------------------------------------
Now Huntelaar is scoring goals regularly for his NT & in a league superior to Serie-A

We missed a gem.

OCmilano · 20-10-2010, 20:19

Quote:

Originally Posted by ACMILAN1983

Pippo is willing to be 4th choice striker, something i doubt Huntelaar is.

LMAOOOOOOOOOOOO!!! If I was 37 years old I'd be 7th choice just to stay on board at Milan.

There is no changing your mind. I hope Pippo starts over Ibra and Pato this season to make you happy then.

Elmago99 · 21-10-2010, 00:02

I think the argument here makes no sense....

There was never a question of whether to keep Inzaghi OR Huntelaar...

Berlusconi wanted MONEY. He bought Robinho and Ibrahimovic and wanted some money BACK.

Inzaghi cannot be sold for anything. However, Huntelaar could be sold for €15 Million at least. Therefore, Huntelaar was sold. Borriello wanted to leave, and we received a good offer IMO for him. I wish both of them the best of luck, but I'm very happy with Ibrahimovic.

---------Ibrahimovic----Pato------------
--------------------Ganso----------------

When this happens you guys won't remember who Inzaghi, Huntelaar, OR Boriello even is. Gilardino won't even be recognizable.

ACMILAN1983 · 21-10-2010, 02:54

Quote:

Originally Posted by OCmilano

LMAOOOOOOOOOOOO!!! If I was 37 years old I'd be 7th choice just to stay on board at Milan.

There is no changing your mind. I hope Pippo starts over Ibra and Pato this season to make you happy then.

That's a rather childish response. Both me and you know Huntelaar wants to play and at Milan neither him or Borriello would find space in the team, so they left. Pippo is obviously willing to accept the bench and that's all there is to it.

My point has nothing to do with my opinion on Pippo.

mzk57 · 21-10-2010, 08:44

In a 4-3-3, both Ibra and Huntelaar would have enough time and matches to play throughout the season, as Pato is now a winger more than a striker. Plus the point is not why Milan had to sell to get money back, but should have never used it on Robinho in first place.

@ Elmago99:
No matter what happens, I will never ever forget Giladino's goal against Man Utd in UCL 2007. I am sure you won't either

drucurl · 21-10-2010, 19:33

Quote:

Originally Posted by mzk57

Instead of wasting money on the loser Robinho, ACM should have kept KJH & signed VdV or Honda etc. That would have been real smart business. Ibrahimovic + Robinho with no attacking/creative midfielder coming is simply foolishness. 2 so called big name strikers came in & all here went crazy and started dreaming of silverware. Now see Robinho is not even getting a chance to play & when he gets, he isn't doing anything special. If ACM had kept KJH & brought in, VdV, then all the Seedorf, Ronaldinho & Pirlo hatters would have been happy to see them out of the team & Ibrahimovic, Pato, KJH rotating as the forwards. But noooooooooooo .................. we got Robinho

------------------------------------
Now Huntelaar is scoring goals regularly for his NT & in a league superior to Serie-A

We missed a gem.

An ode to the #1 poster on MM

Once upon a time in a land far far away,
lived a wise old sage by the name of z**k*y.
Who soon grew tired of the way,
people lived their lives and the things they'd say.

Then an !dea came to his head
to write down all his thoughts in red
why write smart stuff? he thought instead,
to write the musings of one misled

So when you read his posts.......stay calm
Don't be shocked or sound alarm
Hold your nose or smell the farm
And hold your face inside your palm

William Druspeare

Lebanese · 21-10-2010, 21:01

Quote:

Originally Posted by mzk57

Instead of wasting money on the loser Robinho, ACM should have kept KJH & signed VdV or Honda etc. That would have been real smart business. Ibrahimovic + Robinho with no attacking/creative midfielder coming is simply foolishness. 2 so called big name strikers came in & all here went crazy and started dreaming of silverware. Now see Robinho is not even getting a chance to play & when he gets, he isn't doing anything special. If ACM had kept KJH & brought in, VdV, then all the Seedorf, Ronaldinho & Pirlo hatters would have been happy to see them out of the team & Ibrahimovic, Pato, KJH rotating as the forwards. But noooooooooooo .................. we got Robinho

------------------------------------
Now Huntelaar is scoring goals regularly for his NT & in a league superior to Serie-A

We missed a gem.

no disrespect buddy but you need to Practice safe S*X And Go ***K your self

, for the bundslega part and KJH

Lebanese · 21-10-2010, 21:10

Quote:

Originally Posted by OCmilano

Pippo has played with this team for much longer. Dont you think that helps?

So if you were the head coach you would like to keep a 37 yr old pippo over Huntelaar? Is your real name Allegri by any chance?

according to your theory, Kaladze is way better than Thiago because we him signed in 2001 and he played with this team for much longer

, this is like comparing a 40 yrs old maldini to a 28 years old burdisso

.

drucurl · 21-10-2010, 21:32

Quote:

Originally Posted by Lebanese

no disrespect buddy but you need to Practice safe S*X And Go ***K your self

, for the bundslega part and KJH

I realize you're tryin to be an idiot and all
And I'mma let you finish but mzk57's the best ....

19-10-2010, 13:39	#304
Reza Administrator Join Date: 08 2002 Location: Canada Fave Players: Baresi	Everybody please take it easy on this subject. Don't get into personal stuff and insults It is no secret that I rather not ban and ask all to use the ignore list if needed. __________________ aka rezag

21-10-2010, 08:44	#311
mzk57 Registered User Join Date: 02 2006 Location: Madak Lasht, PK Fave Players: DM10 PM3 AN13 JZ4 GB9 FL8 PN11 WS10 DV7 JDT & KJH	In a 4-3-3, both Ibra and Huntelaar would have enough time and matches to play throughout the season, as Pato is now a winger more than a striker. Plus the point is not why Milan had to sell to get money back, but should have never used it on Robinho in first place. @ Elmago99: No matter what happens, I will never ever forget Giladino's goal against Man Utd in UCL 2007. I am sure you won't either __________________ On 3-7-2010 I thought I would quit watching football, but lllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll "WHY so serious?....." Let's put a SMILE on that face! "

21-10-2010, 00:02	#309
Elmago99 Registered User Join Date: 06 2010 Location: New York Fave Players: Nesta, Pippo, Ibra, Rino, Maldini, Tevez, Drogba	I think the argument here makes no sense.... There was never a question of whether to keep Inzaghi OR Huntelaar... Berlusconi wanted MONEY. He bought Robinho and Ibrahimovic and wanted some money BACK. Inzaghi cannot be sold for anything. However, Huntelaar could be sold for €15 Million at least. Therefore, Huntelaar was sold. Borriello wanted to leave, and we received a good offer IMO for him. I wish both of them the best of luck, but I'm very happy with Ibrahimovic. ---------Ibrahimovic----Pato------------ --------------------Ganso---------------- When this happens you guys won't remember who Inzaghi, Huntelaar, OR Boriello even is. Gilardino won't even be recognizable.