05-09-2018, 12:57 AM
(05-09-2018, 12:40 AM)reza Wrote: Are you talking about Silva? two is irrelevant when it is not even a full season.
I think we are missing an important point here. No one is saying Silva is Messi but when the guy competing with him is a total fail the other (ie Silva) must be given as much (arguably since he is way younger and new to a league much more) before he is discarded or considered flop. Jay Crisp asks why I mention Kalinic everytime I am talking about Silva but in my opinion the reasoning is obvious, they are competing for the same job.
You have said this before that if Kalinic is so bad Silva shpuld be or has to be given as mych time.It doesnt and cant work like that.The fact that 2 managers that see him day in day out would start or bring in Kalinic rather than Silva shows they think Kalinic is the better option , which sounds stupid as Kalinic is a carthorse.
No one said he should be Messi or expectes him to be but no one thought hed be Matri either.
He has a lot of glaring holes in his game when he plays for Milan and thats why he has not been trusted nore than he has.He cost a lot he's delivered little.
To the other point what I mean is if anyone says Silva has disappointed instead of any actual disgussion it goes straight to BUT WHAT ABOUT KALINIC.Silva has looked lost , laboured on the ball no movement off it , dribbling has been poor passing has been mediocre at best he stops any momentum an attack has most of the time and never knows what he wants or should do.Fortunately we can probably recoup most of what we paid if they decide to cut their loss.No team will pay for Kalinic he will go on loan IMO.