05-25-2018, 02:41 PM
(05-25-2018, 12:17 PM)ACMILAN1983 Wrote: Hitman, at this point I wouldn't make any assumptions on UEFA's rulings. Given we've reached this point to begin with makes our situation very difficult.
On the background checks, again I'm not sure what's been done and while I agree that it seems hard to imagine that all of this could have happened without Yonghong Li having money, the way things have worked out makes it difficult to understand how thorough and lenient the checks were. Bear in mind Elliot have a history of lending to businesses in serious trouble as they can later cease and strip assets for profit.
As for Li being the representative for a consortium isn't exactly filling most with confidence, because there's no transparency to know if that's the case and until now huge proportions of the financing has been carried out by taking high interest loans from Elliot. If there are backers, there's zero visibility on them funding anything and it's alarming that Li's been struggling to pay of relatively paltry amounts (10m) and needing his wife (who comes from a wealthy background) as a guarantor.
The thing is that while I respect your optimism, the signals coming out are that Li's or whoever's finances aren't in order and therefore there are very real concerns about their financial health or ability to fund the club. More importantly, it's public knowledge that we're fast approaching deadlines to repay Elliot and have yet to refinance the debts. These are the same concerns that UEFA will have and until now, regardless of their financial expertise, what's been submitted clearly hasn't convinced them of the club's future.
Something has to change as this can't be sustained now. Either Li has to give up the club, or he's got to show he's capable of financially supporting the club.
If you seriously think he has troubles trying to pay 10m (1%) after spending already about 1b on Milan (debt or not), then I respectfully withdraw myself from this conversation as there’s nothing to talk about.
Anyways, the board meeting 30 mins ago was precisely regarding this 10m capital increase which was fulfilled but Fassone also mentioned that there’ll be a further 30m capital increase before the end of June. This above negates your theory that he doesn’t have 10m to spend.
Yes he has been using his wife as a guarantor... but so what? Have you considered the possibility that the majority shareholder is the family of his wife who have all their connections with the governments? It’s definitely likely for their family to pick a male rather than a female to be the representative of this consortium but Li is not the sole owner of mIlan, always remember that and that’s where everybody makes their wrong conclusions. I wouldn’t be surprised if he owned less than 20% of Milan. He’s just the face that represents the consortium.
Now let’s go to your comment about Elliott being known for stripping assets and selling them at a profit - which is true. This, if anything, strengthens the argument that Elliott are confident they’d be able to sell MIlan at a profit and for them to do that, they’ll need MIlan to be run efficiently in order to maximize those gains right? Well, they’ve approved of this ownership and management (they mentioned Fassone specifically by name) and confided in them to pay them back their loan. If Yonghong Li fails to pay back the loan, Elliott will be forced to sell to a new owner who will want his own management and that will set MIlan behind decreasing their value even further. That’s is not the ideal scenario for Elliott.





