Milan to leave San Siro
Build our own if we can. Sharing with inter will raise more complications.
AC MILAN
Reply
Own stadium would be better. Clubs around Europe are always fascinated by us sharing and wonder why they cannot do the same with their City rivals. There are positives in either case.
Reply
Not to promote violence or tension, but what's so good about harmony between city rivals? That almost looks hypocritical or political to me.
Reply
Exactly that. It lowers violence and tension.
Avaiting for arrival of exorcist into our boardroom.
Reply
Big Grin

I still like to see some bantering between the rival clubs. When Merda or Ladri wins I don't want our club officials to be happy. Maybe a polite congratulatory note, but it should end there. Big Grin
Reply
Elliot has to leave legacy here before leaving /selling(one day) by "building " us OWN stadium.. that way, higher value too for future buyer imo
Reply
yeah, an "Elliot" stadium seems nice Big Grin
Reply
(03-30-2019, 06:22 AM)Aficio Wrote: yeah, an "Elliot" stadium seems nice Big Grin

can be named after Elliot even after they leave... but with some compensation  Sagrin
Reply
Milan President Paolo Scaroni has asserted that ‘I’d miss San Siro too, but I miss a winning Rossoneri even more.’

“My objective is to give Milan the most beautiful stadium in the world, and there’s only one way: building a stadium from scratch.

“Restructuring is impractical for objective reasons: you can’t conduct pervasive work by playing every three days, while moving away from the city for three years seems unacceptable to me.

“Sharing with Inter [lets us] reduce costs and because the technology allows us to change the branding and colouring of the stadium easily.
“Instead, we have to spend 4m a year for these interventions right now. Milan and Inter, unlike other 'fellow' teams, have proven to be able to live together."
Reply
Good article on a possible new stadium: https://sempremilan.com/everything-you-n...um-dilemma
Reply