Winter Mercato - 2025
#61
Rethinking is the one thing that make our brain strong.

Don't like Conceicao because he is similar to Conte, now Conte is riding Napoli at the top -> choose Conceicao.

Zirkzee and his agent chose England/MU over us, ok, they also have the right to re-choose. We should be generous at heart (also because we can not be generous with money)
We all know the story between Mbappe vs Real, rejected to stay with PSG, made Real angry, and now...
#62
(12-31-2024, 02:54 PM)nefremo Wrote: It's funny how quickly things change. 6 months ago people would have gladly signed a 40m check for Zirkzee...and now he "sucks". Muani went to PSG for 95m 18 months ago, while Darwin did the similar thing (i think 80-85m) to Liverpool in 2022.

The truth is, all three are good players. But all three were definitely massively overpriced and for sure a bit overrated.

I don't want Zirkzee now because I think we need a true CF and not this false 9 thing. But i'd take 1 of the other 2 without any question.

Does this new coach play with two strikers? I think I read that somewhere but can correct me if I'm wrong.
Zirkzee + Darwin would be sick - sell whoever we need to. We don't have a single capable striker on our team and it's showing. When your most frequent scorer as of late is a midfielder it speaks volumes of the quality of our strikers.
#63
Oh, dear, let's hope he play with two strikers. I'm sick of those pussies playing with only one striker.
Avaiting for arrival of exorcist into our boardroom.
#64
Chuk out for a month, so I guess we won't be able to sell him in January.
#65
If rumours are true we are willing to listen to offers of 25 million for Tomori, that means we will be listen to offers of 10 million for Chuk. Poor player or not what's the point? Not that it is a guarantee that any money will be spent well any way.
#66
(01-01-2025, 03:15 AM)reza Wrote: If rumours are true we are willing to listen to offers of 25 million for Tomori, that means we will be listen to offers of 10 million for Chuk. Poor player or not what's the point? Not that it is a guarantee that any money will be spent well any way.

Yeah. But it's also not a guarantee that it won't be spent well. I mean, we wasted money on Royal, RLC(??), Chukwueze. But we also spent money on Pulisic, Reijnders and Fofana.

So, fingers crossed?[emoji1696]
#67
Those are realistic prices. Tomori is worth 22M, Chuku 18.
There is no reason on earth for clubs to overprice those two. You can fins tons of similar players elsewhere.
Avaiting for arrival of exorcist into our boardroom.
#68
Sempremilan: Origi costs the club a total of €5.4m every year and Ballo-Toure costs a total of €2.67m every year, for a combined €8.07m every year. Even though the left-back has played three times with Milan Futuro this season, this is still like burning money for Milan.
#69
(01-01-2025, 07:34 PM)Zio Fester Wrote: Sempremilan: Origi costs the club a total of €5.4m every year and Ballo-Toure costs a total of €2.67m every year, for a combined €8.07m every year. Even though the left-back has played three times with Milan Futuro this season, this is still like burning money for Milan.

We all know this. We've known it for a long time now. Nothing new. We're stuck with these unambitious crappy players and it costs us a lot of money. Mistake was made long time ago, not sure why it's reported as if it was breaking news.
#70
Darwin Nunez links seem pretty solid,... Wish this istrue