Alberto Aquilani
#21
(04-21-2012, 10:29 PM)xudong Wrote: I personally think it would be pathetic if the management would order Allegri to not use him for better negotiation position, even though Aquilani isn't exactly my favoriate player at Milan with all his injuries.

After what happened to us this season, I am getting so sick and tired of all the injury situation; and I know it is unkind to say this, but I am really getting annoyed by players who are consistently sidelined (Flamini, Pato, Boateng, Aquilani, etc). Angry

We pulled out of negotiation because of teeth issue so with this board you'll never know. But on 2nd thought, the player himself doesn't look he wants to convince his future employer. How long has he been fit now? A month? How many games does he need to really add something? I'm not asking for a world beating kind of performance, but he's been absolutely rubbish in each of his game after injury.
per l'amaro e il dolce
Reply
#22
his performance after injury has somehow made me think twice, to buy him or not..

I may rather give more playing time to merkel if he (merkel) stays.
Reply
#23
(04-22-2012, 05:00 PM)Gabriel426 Wrote: I would get him for 6 and sell him for 8.

LOL. but that is actually not a bad idea though. with crazy teams like Chelsea, Real Madrid, Barcelona, Manchester City, and PSG inflating the prices up, one could certainly pay between 10-15 million for player like Aquilani.

(04-22-2012, 05:24 PM)ZvonimirBoban Wrote: And who would want to buy him for 8?

Maybe sell him back to Liverpool for a profit. Devilol Weren't they stupid enough to spend 35M on Carroll? Sagrin
Reply
#24
wow, liverpool spent 35mln on carroll? if thats true seriously thats probably the worst move of the century.. haha and aquilani, not to convinced with keeping him.
Reply
#25
(04-22-2012, 06:58 PM)WCmilan Wrote: wow, liverpool spent 35mln on carroll? if thats true seriously thats probably the worst move of the century.. haha and aquilani, not to convinced with keeping him.

yep, 35 million british pounds.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport2/hi/football...382215.stm
Reply
#26
as someone pointed out in the chat during the game today, i think we are obligated to buy him after loan.

unfortunately. he is not worth 6 million.
Reply
#27
(04-22-2012, 08:26 PM)Stitch Wrote: as someone pointed out in the chat during the game today, i think we are obligated to buy him after loan.

unfortunately. he is not worth 6 million.

Not if he doesn't reach 25 appearances.
So far he played 19 times.

I really don't think we should buy him, though.
Reply
#28
really? didnt know that.

nice find. i hope we dont buy him. he had a few good games, but he was trash most of the time.
Reply
#29
(04-22-2012, 07:01 PM)xudong Wrote:
(04-22-2012, 06:58 PM)WCmilan Wrote: wow, liverpool spent 35mln on carroll? if thats true seriously thats probably the worst move of the century.. haha and aquilani, not to convinced with keeping him.

yep, 35 million british pounds.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport2/hi/football...382215.stm

wow thats seriously ridiculous if i wanted a player like him id just buy osvaldo off roma for like 10m and call it a day thats terrible, we paid less for ibra :p
Reply
#30
(04-22-2012, 09:40 PM)Sputnik Wrote:
(04-22-2012, 08:26 PM)Stitch Wrote: as someone pointed out in the chat during the game today, i think we are obligated to buy him after loan.

unfortunately. he is not worth 6 million.

Not if he doesn't reach 25 appearances.
So far he played 19 times.

I really don't think we should buy him, though.

Actually I think after yesterday it's 23 appearances for him so far. Might be wrong.

I don't really mind Aquilani, he's a decent squad player even if not starter material.

I'm surprised some of you guys didn't know about the Caroll price, it's one of the biggest jokes here in England.
Reply