I've looked at the scores Sportsmediaset and Gazzetta have given our market and they give 7. Mostly saying we reinforced without spending.
Personally, I'd say our market is more like a 4. We got Honda for free, a decent deal imo but one which we should have bitten the bullet and got him back in the summer. Rami imo isn't particularly better than what we have. Essien is a crocked midfielder over a number of years and offers literally no guarantees despite he was a great player with great success in the past. Finally, Taarabt, well, let's just say I've said plenty already on what I think of this transfer.
Now...I've also come across some other interesting news too, both related to Barbara. The first is related to our market:
http://www.milannews.it/calciomercato-mi...any-135345
According to this report, Barbara prevented the Biabiany transfer taking place, not convinced by it despite Seedorf wanting the player. Now, we know Leonardi (Parma director) says we wanted a free loan which they rejected, only willing to sell. That means Barbara was unprepared to spend on a player she wasn't convinced of, which may be quite telling as to how much control she's taking.
Here's what I hope and believe may be the case. Biabiany on a free loan would have been accepted, it's low cost and low risk. However, as soon as the deal meant having to buy him outright, those aside from Galliani weren't willing to make such a high risk commitment.
If that's the case, then why accept Essien, Rami and Taraabt (I assume Honda was accepted by all for his technical qualities and marketing value)? In Essien's case, I believe Galliani will have made arrangements prior to Barbara gaining any control at the club. This is firstly because Galliani said the deal was in the works for the past 3 months, but also because there's no way the clubs would just agree a free transfer within a couple of weeks.
As for Rami, again he was agreed and training with us before she got control. That said, both this and the Taarabt transfer are free loans where the risk is pretty low. If Galliani's no longer in control in the summer, then I bet these guys won't be kept on. Even if Galliani's in control I wouldn't be surprised if these transfers are prevented from going through.
This is pure speculation on my part, but looking to read between the lines, this is the only reasoning which makes logical sense to me as to why Biabiany would be rejected yet we got these other players. That said, I've misjudged how stupid our management can be plenty of times in recent times, so I'm aware I'm probably more likely wrong than right.
Anyway, the other news is this:
http://www.milannews.it/altre-notizie/nu...nni-135267
Basically, from what I understand (please correct me if wrong), Barbara's looking at another potential location for the stadium. We already know about the region in Lombardy, where the Milan fan Maroni's in charge, but this place is a former steel works factory owned by Davide Bizzi and the location will be strategically beneficial as the subway is due to be extended to run through to the location. Previously, in 2005, Inter was interested in building a new stadium here, but nothing came of it.
Essentially, it looks like we're opening our options as to where to build the new stadium and based on this, we are almost certainly looking to build a new stadium in the next couple of years.
(02-01-2014, 09:35 AM)Gabriel426 Wrote: Any one of you guys know how much did Inter paid for Hernanes?
From what I've read it was in the region of 20m.