(06-06-2011, 07:22 PM)Jay Crisp Wrote: This was a once off I believe but it really looks intentional..Witsel breaking Wasilewskis leg http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W52fN9_JG...re=related
Wow, that's a bad tackle. Could be risky having both Witsel and Flamini on the field at the same time...
06-06-2011, 08:33 PM
(This post was last modified: 06-06-2011, 08:34 PM by ElMago99.)
If the FIGC were to change the rule that (2) Non-Serie-A players can transfer to (1) team, they would have done it by now. So, therefore, we have to understand that we will only get 1 player as of now without an E.U. Passport (unless they're already in Serie A).
This is very important in understanding our transfer policy. I think Galliani wants to make a move for one or two players, but he won't do it unless he feels he gets a good deal. He won't be pressured to buy, just as he has not felt pressure the past few years. He'll take a deal that exists, not one he creates.
it seems Barcelona offered 30 m euros plus Bojan Krkic for Sanchez and however they are favourites to land him... Our difference from Barcelona is... They always want to strength more... if Galliani had their squad, he always would say, ''we are good as we are'' Sanchez is a great player, he will improve their quality...
06-06-2011, 10:38 PM
(This post was last modified: 06-06-2011, 10:39 PM by Ca Rossonero.)
(06-06-2011, 10:12 PM)abbeyleemania Wrote: it seems Barcelona offered 30 m euros plus Bojan Krkic for Sanchez and however they are favourites to land him... Our difference from Barcelona is... They always want to strength more... if Galliani had their squad, he always would say, ''we are good as we are'' Sanchez is a great player, he will improve their quality...
um nah.... the difference is they generate 150-170 million more euros in revenue than us with less tax.
Pretty much over last 5-7 years spanish duo keep growing cause of new TV deal which fucks 18 teams in la liga but makes madrid and barca earn over 400 mil a year (we're 225-240 at most)
If Galliani had that money he'd do same. But he doesn't and he knows how to play politics do a degree
(06-06-2011, 05:14 PM)russo-neri Wrote: man, there is nothing going on today. Galliani must be lying on a beach somewhere.
he is lying wherever he goes. he is a great liar. 
(06-06-2011, 10:38 PM)Ca Rossonero Wrote: um nah.... the difference is they generate 150-170 million more euros in revenue than us with less tax.
Pretty much over last 5-7 years spanish duo keep growing cause of new TV deal which fucks 18 teams in la liga but makes madrid and barca earn over 400 mil a year (we're 225-240 at most)
If Galliani had that money he'd do same. But he doesn't and he knows how to play politics do a degree
Pretty much this. Its part of the reason why they spent almost 30 mil on chigrinski and they didnt felt it (we spent less than 30 on Dinho and with all the shirt selling we did feel like it was money wasted). Worse with Madrid they can spend 68 mil and 10 mil of wages on a bench player...give me any other team in the world that can do that.
The thing is that was how Milan used to spend in the 80s and early 90s.
06-07-2011, 04:40 AM
(This post was last modified: 06-07-2011, 04:50 AM by WCmilan.)
Barca is in huge debt let us not forget.. 0% of our team is debt, even Inter is in quite a hefty debt.. Berlusconi is better a business man then a football club owner, he manages the club well.. Most club owners don't care because once they pass away or whatever be the case they don't have to deal with this , Berlu will be giving the club to his daughter, his daughter i'm sure will pass it on to her and patos children  i dont think we will live to see the end of milan being owned by berlusconi family. Anyhow, 80-100 million should be spent this mercato.. I wouldn't be disappointed with 50 or 60 either, but 100 million is the perfect budget. Witsel -10, Fabregas or Bale -50, Ganso -35..
We need a world class left midfielder, a world class cam and a diverse player who can play in many positions in the midfield.. Sort of like what barca do with keita now.. Another huge factor is producing more youth talents, there was a rumour one time that we would offer merkel + 35mln for fabregas.. In my opinion a big NO, merkel has huge potential.. Wenger is a master at finding young talents but not so good putting together a winning squad, he fails to realize teenagers wont win him a CL, this isn't pele era anymore.. He admires Merkel, he should stay on the 100.. I think 100% he is ready to be a first team player, maybe not starting 11 but it would be good to start integrating him into it from now
06-07-2011, 08:14 AM
(This post was last modified: 06-07-2011, 08:23 AM by Gabriel426.)
You know whats funny, the current Milan is still the same team that could not score a goal against the Spurs this past season.
Thats why Milan need better players, esp in the midfield.
(06-07-2011, 01:24 AM)cuoremilan Wrote: (06-06-2011, 10:38 PM)Ca Rossonero Wrote: um nah.... the difference is they generate 150-170 million more euros in revenue than us with less tax.
Pretty much over last 5-7 years spanish duo keep growing cause of new TV deal which fucks 18 teams in la liga but makes madrid and barca earn over 400 mil a year (we're 225-240 at most)
If Galliani had that money he'd do same. But he doesn't and he knows how to play politics do a degree
Pretty much this. Its part of the reason why they spent almost 30 mil on chigrinski and they didnt felt it (we spent less than 30 on Dinho and with all the shirt selling we did feel like it was money wasted). Worse with Madrid they can spend 68 mil and 10 mil of wages on a bench player...give me any other team in the world that can do that.
The thing is that Barca and Real both draw major crowd and sponsorship. Maybe they take more than teams like Seville or Villereal in terms of TV deal...but without, the other 18 teams in La Liga would have gotten less.
I am not saying Serie A should do that, but at the very least be more fair. As why should Milan, aka the Champion, gets the same portion as a team like Parma who just managed to stay in Serie A. Also why should Inter not gets more portion of the TV deal from Japan than Lecce, since nobody gives a damn about Lecce in Japan while they follow Inter due to Nagatomo or Milan or Juve due to them being Milan and Juve.
Rather you want to admit it or not, these TV sponsorship deals will make or break a club, I just don't see why teams like Milan, Juve, and Inter needs to suffer in order to help teams like Lecce and Parma.
We're not listed as interested in either Bale or Fabregas. At least not in this article... I know it's Goal.com.
http://www.goal.com/en/news/1717/editori...-who-could
|