Crespo likes Milan and wants to play for rosso neri. Do we want him back?

I want him back. There are several reasons. But first of all I sing for this move providing that chelski wont want [too much] money for his departure. If his price is appropriate then we can start discussion. Regarding Pippo's will to quit the team for Roma, we wont have another striker. Crespo knows our squad quite well, he enjoys Carletto as a coach [if he still wont be sacked] and fans like him too.

Yeah get him back his a good player,pipo whants to go to roma?well he can go crespo is was is gonna be always better then him.Get the trio back again:kaka-sheva-crespo.That was a a elite scoring machine.

I do recall speakin when Crespo had goaless start last season that he is worthless. It was the same with Gila this year. However they both started to score. So if we want to acquire Crespo we have to get rid of one of these two Gila or Pippo. But I recall once Carletto said he fancies idea of possession of five forwards at the same moment... so...

again :keep gila sell pipo,crespo way better.

Originally Posted by GRE-NO-LI

Well, it's very polemical stuff: that's the symbol of Hizbollah.

actually, it's spelled "hezbollah". I sure hope you know at least what it means.
Also, it might be a good idea to choose something less polemical for your avatar for there might be people in here who might get offended by this, if you know what I mean. From what I have witnessed, politically inclined slogans and such aren't seen with a good eye on this forum for they are usually insensitive to the beliefs and understandings of certain other forum members.
And if a mod hasn't asked you to change your avatar already, it's probably because they don't know what it is.
Just a friendly advice.

Originally Posted by acmilan918

we should never have let him go in the 1st place. He wanted to stay in Milan, but apparently he wasn't offered an extension by Galliani and the gang so he had no choice but to go back to Chelsea. I was very sad to see him go, as he was working well with Sheva and Kaka. I think this season he would have played better than Gila, and once again I am not saying that I do not like Gila. Its just that Crespo is more experienced and he could have been more consistent in some of the games (remember when Gila missed 3 golden opportunities in one half and only Pippo bailed us out in the 94th minute)

I agree here, he should ve stayed with Milan...I still dont understand why Milan made such decision...
And you know what?! I think Inzaghi should play most of the time for now and Gila should be substitution, cause while he needs to learn and develope in Milan we still need to win and score...I dont know, maybe Inzaghi 45 mins and Gila 45 mins...I m scared that Inzaghi ll leave us, cause he is full of energy and doesnt play...

Originally Posted by GRE-NO-LI

Well, it's very polemical stuff: that's the symbol of Hizbollah.

yea, as Zlat has said, you better change the avatar

I voted yes as he would be an excellent squad player

hes a quality player ............ full stop if your gonna get some idiot called amoroso from the brazilian league who we nothing about

why not crespo ....................... Milan revitalized him hes banging goals in .......... so why not

Crespo Vs Amoroso = we all know whos better

We do know alot about Amoroso he's played in serie a for around 5 seasons and he was awesome well maybe not for parma but for udinese. At the moment you have to say crespo is the better player though just becuase he's getting games, but when both on top form it is hard to choose between them.
Amoroso has been top scorer in Italy and Germany.

what about the present?

well the present Gila hasnt done badly has he? we bought a player who had destroyed defences for 2 seasons at Parma before joining us so its not like he is an investment for some distant future, he is already very capable. Give him a season to get used to the club and then we can reap the benefits for the next decade

A lot gets made of Milan never buying talented youngsters but this is one case of Milan doing exactly that, if i recall correctly (and I may be wrong on this) Milan did want to keep Crespo but Chelsea were charging to much. Milan knew that Crespo was already at his peak whereas Gila hadnt reached his yet, and they knew they couldnt afford both of them. The solution was to bring in Vieri with Gila, that way they had a player at his peak to cover Gila while he developed. The flaw in the plan (easy to spot with hindsight) was that Vieri was useless which when added to Inzaghi's injury problems has put more pressure on Gilardino to perform immediately.

u know what would be cool?if wee could seel amorso at the end of the seson for half the money chealsea would ofer for crespo,and get crespo

Originally Posted by hottie

u know what would be cool?if wee could seel amorso at the end of the seson for half the money chealsea would ofer for crespo,and get crespo

Yep, it d be brilliant, but noone ll do that....

Yep, it d be brilliant, but noone ll do that....

If Chelsea went out and spent £25m - £30m on a new striker like Torres, Eto o or Henry then its possible they might, maybe, try and sell Crespo this summer rather than risk him moaning about not playing enough and disrupting the squad. They might let him go for £5m or so, but even then i would still prefer we spent that money on the defence instead of a 31 year old forward

Originally Posted by Stezagud

If Chelsea went out and spent £25m - £30m on a new striker like Torres, Eto o or Henry then its possible they might, maybe, try and sell Crespo this summer rather than risk him moaning about not playing enough and disrupting the squad. They might let him go for £5m or so, but even then i would still prefer we spent that money on the defence instead of a 31 year old forward

If for 5 million - we have to buy him..we bought Vieri for 10, and he is 33 (thx God sold him now)