Fiorentina vs AC Milan

if catania win today, we will be 12 points away from the 4th place.
which means the game versus them on wednesday at meazza it is going to be a massacre!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

[quote=Jeff][quote=Mystik]It's not that he's attacking you

Thanks :0

And yes, I love you so much Egoistka that I'm lost for words! That's why I have to go against you to show my affection lol

Alright I mean... you won't treat this seriously, right? *LOL*

If your behaviour was like that only when I talk about Gila....but its not only then...

Originally Posted by Mystik

I really would never have even bothered look to see if the ball was within the designated area if you hadn't pointed that out. Let's hope Gila starts midweek as well..he needs to build some momentum.

It is not about bothering to see...on SKY they shown this moment on a replay several times...I was only wondering if Gourcuff did it intentionally, or he also did not notice that?

One thing is for sure..Gourcuff's corner kicks and crosses are way better than Pirlos and he should take it whenever he can.

At least Gila scored it might give him some more confidence to keep on scoring.

gosh, inter just scored thru crazy goal by materazzi

Originally Posted by sveto

gosh, inter just scored thru crazy goal by materazzi

I couldn't believe my eyes when i saw him score such goal !!!!!
They are a quality side but they are really having their momentum. The ball wants them and whoever shots and however he shots the ball, it goes in.

Originally Posted by Tony29.

I couldn't believe my eyes when i saw him score such goal !!!!!
They are a quality side but they are really having their momentum. The ball wants them and whoever shots and however he shots the ball, it goes in.

Yes the goal was great, but I dont like Inter in general because of one thing (and its not that they are also from Milan)...The reason is that they always play a dirty football with absolutely no respect to other players and coaches...That is their huge problem.

Guys, I actually wanted to ask you, but then forgot...
Why did Ancelotti let Inzaghi play so late in the game? The sub was made like at 33 minutes of the second half...Did't he see that we needed him before?..And if he would make this sub 15 - 20 minutes before, maybe we even had a chance to win the game. Who knows?! But in fact Inzaghi had only 10 minutes of the game. Really strange decisions sometimes...
Does anyone agree with me that he should have made this sub earlie?

I agree. But what can we do? The coach has to get his mum permission before making any subsititue.

Originally Posted by mrki

One thing is for sure..Gourcuff's corner kicks and crosses are way better than Pirlos and he should take it whenever he can.

Yes, we should ban Seedorf from taking any corner kick as well. His corners are totally waste of opportunity. Doesn't deserve to wear our #10 shirt. He should give it to Kaka.

Originally Posted by Red&Black

I agree. But what can we do? The coach has to get his mum permission before making any subsititue.

Exactly, we cannot do anything...But it really is annoying sometimes. I really think that we could have even won this game...but what can a player if he comes in 10 minutes before the end of the game? I guess nothing much...

Originally Posted by Egoistka

Guys, I actually wanted to ask you, but then forgot...
Why did Ancelotti let Inzaghi play so late in the game? The sub was made like at 33 minutes of the second half...Did't he see that we needed him before?..And if he would make this sub 15 - 20 minutes before, maybe we even had a chance to win the game. Who knows?! But in fact Inzaghi had only 10 minutes of the game. Really strange decisions sometimes...
Does anyone agree with me that he should have made this sub earlie?

Honestly, i think Carlo was satysfied with a draw, and that's why he didn't go for the 2nd attacker. But right after Mutu scored in 76th minute, he had no choice but to introduce second attacker, and that's what he did right after Fiorentina took the lead !
If Mutu didn't score, my opinion is that Carlo would have continued with only 1 attacker !

My problem with Carlo is that he places way too much trust in Seedorf. Seedorf needed to be subbed way before when he actually was.

Originally Posted by Tony29.

Honestly, i think Carlo was satysfied with a draw, and that's why he didn't go for the 2nd attacker. But right after Mutu scored in 76th minute, he had no choice but to introduce second attacker, and that's what he did right after Fiorentina took the lead !
If Mutu didn't score, my opinion is that Carlo would have continued with only 1 attacker !

How can a coach be satisfied with a draw, when his team in a such bad situation now. Does he notice that we are somewhere at the end of the table? I dont even look at the table mnow, I m scared... That is a new horror movie.."The descent of Milan" (did you see the movie called "The descent"? It is really the most terrifying horror movie i ve ever seen....So I m afraid this is same terrifying... )