Summer Mercato

Originally Posted by Roche13

Everybodys is a expert,it's funny how everyone wanted Gila when he was a hot item and came to Milan,but nobody wanted Pippo when Milan picked him up in the transfer market.

We are never wrong are we?

What about people who still think that Gila had to stay ? lol

Originally Posted by Roche13

Everybodys is a expert,it's funny how everyone wanted Gila when he was a hot item and came to Milan,but nobody wanted Pippo when Milan picked him up in the transfer market.

We are never wrong are we?

pippo cost 25 mil if im correct..... wouldnt say he was unwanted lol

Originally Posted by GeoTav

This seaosn, he had no choice with Ronaldo who was useless and Inzaghi having a huge injury ... His only valid options were Pato in January with Gilardino that you all were bashing here lol (not you Siregar ^^) and of course that pushed up Paloschi in first team.

3 valid options, you can't play with 2 strikers in that situation ...

But again, I say it is enough only IF we buy an offensive midfielder !!

I agree with you but I still prefer we buy 1 striker (big/powerful one) to play 2-striker formation as we have good fullbacks right now and also strong midfielders.

About Paloschi, I do think he is ready for 4th or 3rd striker, I only consider his developement as he wont have games as we expected for a young player IMO.

Originally Posted by Milano84

pippo cost 25 mil if im correct..... wouldnt say he was unwanted lol

He didn't speak about our management but about fans I think ...

Originally Posted by Siregar

About Paloschi, I do think he is ready for 4th or 3rd striker, I only consider his developement as he wont have games as we expected for a young player IMO.

Actually, I would prefer him to stay because, even if I already said that it could be good for him to go on loan, our recent past shows that the players going on loan often stay in their clubs or are loaned again ...

And don't you think it is better for Paloschi to be a sub, playing sometimes and learning from someone like Inzaghi (and playing with talents like Pato, Kaka', Pirlo and co) instead of playing each match for a bottom-table team that has a lot of difficulties ?

I don't want Paloschi to become the new Pozzi lol !!

I prefer the first solution ...

I put 1€ on the table that Gourcuff for example won't come back or will come back for one year and will go again !!

Originally Posted by acmilan24.com

http://www.acmilan24.com/content/view/5298/
Words of Bastian Schweinsteiger's agent: "Milan? Till the end of Euro 2008 I won't say a word on the matter, so that we can prevent series of misunderstandings".

ESCLUSIVA TMW - Schwensteiger, l'agente: "Il Milan? E' presto"
23.06.2008 22.12 di Marco Gori articolo letto 2334 volte
Secondo quanto riportato dall'edizione odierna de L'Equipe, il Milan starebbe seguendo con particolare interesse il trequartista del Bayern e della Nazionale tedesca Bastian Schweinsteiger (23); per saperne di più TMW ha raggiunto poco fa l'agente del giocatore Christoph Graf, il quale tuttavia ha preferito non commentare la notizia, limitandosi a spiegare: "Fino al termine dell'Europeo preferisco non sbilanciarmi, altrimenti si rischia di creare solo degli equivoci".

http://www.tuttomercatoweb.com/?action=read&id=110010

Originally Posted by Milano84

i really like quagliarella. He actually has alot of qualities like wayne rooney (in terms of skill... not douchebaggery). I said we should swap borriello for him when rumors came forth milan and juve were interested in quagliarella.

I think Di Natale and Quagliarella formed this excellent partnership, and I think if they can't be sold together, Udinese should hold onto both of them.

for the euro spain game.... i think no pirlo effected everyone. Aquilani was not ready for this position. Ambrosini worked real hard, but he's not pirlo. Alot of great service di natale, camorenesi etc saw in qualifying was cause of pirlo

Indeed. Pirlo serves many of the long passes... we didn't have that. Ambrosini is just a good solid midfielder that provides a lot... but he's better with Pirlo.

In an ideal situation. palo will be ready for milan when pippo retires...but thats a little while away. Love Paloschi's attitude, desire

Indeed that's the way I see it. Paloschi started quite strongly too... and made himself known with his ten second goal (I think it was ten seconds).

I'm almost going to say keep Paloschi in Milan, and have him play for the U-21 team or something...

You guys might think I'm insane for suggesting this but if milan's management is pursuing Adebayor for scoring a tap-in goal agains us, they might as well sign Roman Pavluchenko or Peter Crouch and likely at half the price of Adebayor.

^^ Don't forget if Paloschi stays and doesn't play a lot he may just lose his place in the U-21 team. I think a loan is the best solution for him...considering we're getting another striker...he'll have 4 strikers ahead of him (Pato, Pippo, new striker, borriello)

yeah... best thing for a young player is exerience... the more he gets the better he gets.... what if he was sent to france? would a different style like that might help him become more all around...

Originally Posted by Milano84

yeah... best thing for a young player is exerience... the more he gets the better he gets.... what if he was sent to france? would a different style like that might help him become more all around...

No, I think it'll probably be best if we there is no space for him... that we loan him out to Reggina.

watching a classic english football match on fsc... arsenal v man utd 2004. now who we need to sign is DJEMBA DJEMBA!!!

Originally Posted by Milano84

watching a classic english football match on fsc... arsenal v man utd 2004. now who we need to sign is DJEMBA DJEMBA!!!

I saw one from 1977 ManU vs Liverpool today... Kevin Keegan was playing lol.

of course someone could watch a milan 2006 match and laugh about ricardo olivera

Originally Posted by ray888

You guys might think I'm insane for suggesting this but if milan's management is pursuing Adebayor for scoring a tap-in goal agains us, they might as well sign Roman Pavluchenko or Peter Crouch and likely at half the price of Adebayor.

Adebayor has been the single most prolific and efficient striker of the foregone year in football. Milan is after him and by right they should after last season...

Then the next argument is to buy Crouch. Crouch is a good player but why not go for the best. Isn't that what Milan really is about??!

Pavluchenko is really good and I want to buy him. But it's either him or Adebayor and frankly I think the latter is a couple of levels above the Russian ace.