Summer mercato 2009

What's the status of mattioni? If he fails,we at least need another quality wingback(left or right)in summer.zambrotta and janku both pushing 32,and janku is a liability in defence.

Originally Posted by Mystik

No point getting Eto'o if we're going to keep Dinho. One striker for the 4-3-2-1 formation and Pato should be getting maximum playing time. The kid has to play to develop. If anything we should look for a decent backup who won't mind sitting on the bench and knows how to score. Maybe bring Di Gennaro and/or Paloschi back to replace Sheva and/or Pippo if Pippo decides to hang up his boots.

As for Gourcuff I'm still confused as to whether I want him back or not. I like him as a player and I don't want him to come back to a substitute role. I think realistically Carlo does not see him as a starter in his plans. So for Gourcuff's best interest he should probably do another year at Bordeaux then go to Bayern or something.

This fearness valid in context Milan keeps carlo as manager. If a new one take over carlo's role, we can keep eto'o, pato, kaka dan gorky all together and play 3 of them or even al of them in some occasion

^^^ Don't forget Dinho. It's because of Dinho we have to play 4-3-2-1 in the first place. It's not a bad formation we just need more mobile midfielders. Players that make more runs into the box and don't just waltz around the centre circle.

A better coach would utilize our youth properly, at the same stage Sacchi also coached a piss poor Milan. His tactics would fail nowdays. I'd prefer not to sign Agger or Mexes. Don't think either are mentally strong enough, besides Galliani always says we won't sign a Roma player as we want to be friends with them???
What happen to the Zapata rumours? Much better option.
Imagine a coach who knew what to do with youth players. We could have Abate, Zapata, Albertazzi, Darmian integrated into team, as well as a quick, mobile team, and an inventive attack not based on players individual abilities, but on a sound tactical understanding. Ah well.

Originally Posted by Tony75

A better coach would utilize our youth properly, at the same stage Sacchi also coached a piss poor Milan. His tactics would fail nowdays. I'd prefer not to sign Agger or Mexes. Don't think either are mentally strong enough, besides Galliani always says we won't sign a Roma player as we want to be friends with them???
What happen to the Zapata rumours? Much better option.
Imagine a coach who knew what to do with youth players. We could have Abate, Zapata, Albertazzi, Darmian integrated into team, as well as a quick, mobile team, and an inventive attack not based on players individual abilities, but on a sound tactical understanding. Ah well.

Do you really think Zapata is mentally stronger than Mexes and Agger? Based on what might I ask? - he is younger than both of them.

And what's the point of being friends with a rival club if you can't sign one of their players?

That last one is for Galliani - I've heard him say too, and always thought it's was stange.

Originally Posted by Mystik

^^^ Don't forget Dinho. It's because of Dinho we have to play 4-3-2-1 in the first place. It's not a bad formation we just need more mobile midfielders. Players that make more runs into the box and don't just waltz around the centre circle.

Yep, i forgot to mention Dinho
We played 4-3-2-1 not only in this season. Since 2006/2007 we played more often with that scheme over 4-3-1-2. We play X-mas tree becoz lacked of good enough striker (in carlo's perspective) and as much portion with that, carlo always eager to fielded his man seedorf though team must be sacrificing alot (as midfielder we're suffering physically & defensively, as trequarista we're lacking man in box)

Originally Posted by Ceceves

And what's the point of being friends with a rival club if you can't sign one of their players?

one time carlo ever said he want to be roma's coach

Originally Posted by Peachtot

one time carlo ever said he want to be roma's coach

Then let's give Carlo to Roma free of charge - as a token of our friendship:

Originally Posted by Ceceves

Then let's give Carlo to Roma free of charge - as a token of our friendship:

and as token of family give Carlo some money but not as compensation to terminate contract, but named it as a keepsake

what is hapent with Hurtado we bought him or he was on trial period?
Ageer is 50% aur player and we will payt for him a 4-8 mil e.
in this summer we mast sold Janku 4-6 mil.e lahm for replecment.. and kaladze 4-8 mil.e. ager to reples him.

and aj forgot a abauth Marco Rossi this player is 50-50 with parma
and for forward j sugest to look at digjon aur Piery Aubamejang have very imresuve games he is troo talent,clinical stricer like PIPO.

Originally Posted by DUCO

what is hapent with Hurtado we bought him or he was on trial period?

He was on trial. He's just signed with the Seattle Sounders, the incoming Major League Soccer franchise (where he'll be a teammate of Freddie Ljungberg and Kasey Keller).

he looked much better than Kaladze in the few minutes we've seen him

Originally Posted by hitmannq8

he looked much better than Kaladze in the few minutes we've seen him

I could have looked better than Kaladze did against Inter.

Originally Posted by Tony75

[...]Galliani always says we won't sign a Roma player as we want to be friends with them???

Originally Posted by Ceceves

That last one is for Galliani - I've heard him say too, and always thought it's was stange.

You guys have totally misunderstood it. We have a gentleman's agreement with Roma, which "prescribes" that neither club are allowed to use the players buy-out clause.