Carlo Ancellotti: 'YES' or 'NO' ?

Originally Posted by ACMILAN1983

Well done in wasting time trolling.

me trolling? please...

the thing is, [s]everyone many[/s] people on this forum [s]discuss[/s] fight over the same damn things for the last half a year.

"let's hope for a great season!" -> "oh no we lose. we suck!" -> "we win we are cool"

"carlo is a great manager" -> "carlo is the worst manager" -> "fire him!" -> "keep him!"...

technically, you are more of a troll than me

Originally Posted by mrki

he is a sophist that uses wikipedia(wtf?), dont bother.

i heard better insults from retards.

btw, wikipedia is always right (c)

hahaha. You dont even understand that insult.

EDIT:

No point. Stay in peace man. Im off.

Originally Posted by mrki

hahaha. You dont even understand that insult.

EDIT:

No point. Stay in peace man. Im off.

hahaha. You can't even make an in insult where there is something to understand.

EDIT:

Thank you god. Thank you jesus.

Originally Posted by fLame

me trolling? please...

the thing is, [s]everyone many[/s] people on this forum [s]discuss[/s] fight over the same damn things for the last half a year.

"let's hope for a great season!" -> "oh no we lose. we suck!" -> "we win we are cool"

"carlo is a great manager" -> "carlo is the worst manager" -> "fire him!" -> "keep him!"...

technically, you are more of a troll than me

lol, all you do is come here to either argue with mrki for the sake of arguing and contribute nothing (and I mean nothing) positive to the forums. Your arguments are not backed up with any evidence and are there to simply provoke others into reaction.

Even your argument about how people were accepting of Carlo during the more positive period of late is a poor argument for which you're yet to back up with any evidence, which I am still waiting for.

You are the very definition of a troll. Oh, and considering how I'm picking on your choice of words, I may as well add that you need to learn the definition of the word sarcasm.

Just casted my vote here. I voted Carlo should stay.
Now let me say we go with the consesus... "Carlo needs to go", okay I respect that and will not be too surprised if it happens. I just hope those that wish to see this through owning up to it. Too many times I see the zeal and fervor of wanting things only to throwing it away,and hating it.

Folks, take it easy. You know what's expected from this forum. Don't carry this too far please.

Thank you.

J

I have to step in again and ask not to get into who is more right or more wrong if you are not capable of doing without keeping it cool

fLame, to be honest even if somebody changed his mind based on two wins or something he/she won't be doing any worse than management. I can guarantee you the only reason Ancelotti was/is going to stay is because we finish second (may be third) our second half wins do have an effect on the management 'liking' Ancelotti

Carlo> (insert name)

I feel that Van Basten would be right for the job. He'll definitely be more attacking-minded in his approach as compared to Carlo. At least he'll ensure that Gourcuff will be in the team. Carlo has mentioned before that he doesn't like Gourcuff. If Carlo stays, so does Seedorf. Which is bad news for Milan and Dinho, cos Carlo prefers Seedorf over Dinho.

No offence guys, thank you for the success but you guys have to move on : Dida, Favalli, Jankulovski, Kaladze, Seedorf and Sheva

Originally Posted by Reza

fLame, to be honest even if somebody changed his mind based on two wins or something he/she won't be doing any worse than management. I can guarantee you the only reason Ancelotti was/is going to stay is because we finish second (may be third) our second half wins do have an effect on the management 'liking' Ancelotti

Thanks Reza. Well, in the long run it's always the results that matter. Would somebody be complaining if we played boring all the time but won the league? Or would somebody prefer playing beautifully and finishing in the Euro League section?

However, I don't understand when fans get into the roller coaster mood and start bashing / praising the team for single performances.

Anyway, I still doubt that we will get a new coach, but even if we do, don't expect instant changes. (unless we get Hiddink, lol)
Actually, Hiddink is the only coach I would take to replace Ancelotti

Hiddink is probably the best in the world along with Cappello, Lippi and maybe one or two more( Ferguson...).

Some on MM say Galliani and Leonardo went to France to talk to Gourcuff, maybe that means Leo will be the new coach.

Originally Posted by fLame

Actually, Hiddink is the only coach I would take to replace Ancelotti

Is that by any chance because they look exactly similar from a distance?

Originally Posted by mrki

Some on MM say Galliani and Leonardo went to France to talk to Gourcuff, maybe that means Leo will be the new coach.

He is our scout, of course he is traveling for negotiations.

Originally Posted by boring

Is that by any chance because they look exactly similar from a distance?

did you notice that too??!!

Originally Posted by boring

Is that by any chance because they look exactly similar from a distance?

I'm not sure if we want Hiddink. He is a good coach, a great coach also, but his complains about Chelsea's final not getting penalty and how that's a stark contrast with his arrogant attitude in Korea is just plain there to see.

Then, of course, on the one hand he said that Australia always play offensive football while Italian defends, only to have done the same thing with his Chelsea aganist Barcelona, shows how a hypocrite he is.

And I also believe he has no love for Italian football anyway.

And Italians have no love in him.

J