![]() |
|
|||||||
| Notices |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#11 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: 04 2005
Location: Croatia
Fave Players: Maldini, Boban, Inzaghi
![]() |
Gazzetta says its Pato-Pippo in front of Seedorf for us.
I want to say this small detail I think is important: Seedorf as an aM behind Pato and Pippo will work worse then Pirlo behind them. In this case Pirlo will end up deep, deep again ( as he shouldnt be ) and we'll end up with playing long passes to Seedorf and Pippo coz Pirlo is in no shape to constantly play as a vertical CM that will create cohesion with the midfield and forwards. To me Pirlo as an am looks better in his current habits of movement and phisical shape. In samt time Seedorf as a LM/CM is a player that can (!if he is fit) play well deeper and has natural habit of playing box-to-box when he is fit and is not secured as starter in 11. With Pirlo as an AM and Seedorf as a CM ( plus Flamini on the right ) we can play normal transition ( Flamini and Seedorf, while Ambrosini plays CENTRAL DM, not left, NOT LEFT!! ) and create in normal and technical way with practically playing 4-2-3-1 in some parts. Im afraid we'll play Seedorf behind the strinkers and we'll loose cohesion in midfield if that happens. Hope Im wrong, we'll see. --Flamini----Ambro--------- -Pato----Pirlo---Seedorf- Practically, this is what I want on the field. The players exchange positions of course.
__________________
"Where others have succeeded, I have always failed..." Jacques Clouseau
|
|
|
|