Crespo likes Milan and wants to play for rosso neri. Do we want him back?

Crespo likes Milan and wants to play for rosso neri. Do we want him back?
I think Crespo did a lot for Milan.

I voted no, Crespo is already at his peak and like Sheva, Pippo and Amoroso he will steadily decline over the next few years. In my opinion the next striker we buy should be a younger player to balance the side more.

Plus, Chelsea could change a fortune for him. Can we really afford to spend £12m on a striker with the defence as it is?

No, for the same reasons expressed by Stezagud.

Depending on terms. I mean, if we can get him cheap, why would you sign Amoroso and then say "No" to Crespo? Makes no sense.

Originally Posted by GilAttack [11]

Depending on terms. I mean, if we can get him cheap, why would you sign Amoroso and then say "No" to Crespo? Makes no sense.

Yeah, but we cannot get him cheap......so I prefer buying some good defenders instead

yeah i prefer two,good defender but i voted yes,i would have preferd if wee dident buy gila and keeped crespo and only buy new atackers in the next 4 years:sheva-crespo way better the sheva-gila.

Originally Posted by hottie

yeah i prefer two,good defender but i voted yes,i would have preferd if wee dident buy gila and keeped crespo and only buy new atackers in the next 4 years:sheva-crespo way better the sheva-gila.

That is so true...In 4 years time or even 3 years time it would make sense, but now...Crespo would be better for now, maybe if we had Crespo, we wouldnt be 12 points behind Juventus, with Fiorentina and Roma on our tail..Sheaf Crespo - Sheva worked far more successfully.

I voted yes, I think he would be a good addition to the side.
He is constantly scoring at Chelsea, and also setting up other's goals, which Gila rarely ever does.

Don't misunderstand me though, I think Gila was a great addition but he still has to play several seasons to fullfil his potential completely. In the current circumstances, Crespo could benefit Milan greatly.

Stezagud is correct: Let's look to the future, not to the past.

Originally Posted by GRE-NO-LI

Stezagud is correct: Let's look to the future, not to the past.

what about the present?

Signing Crespo would be like taking a step backwards. Initially, I thought that he could replace Pippo for next season. But closer inspection reveals that he can be just as inconsistent, due to poor form or injury. I say stick with Gila, he's developing nicely into an all-round forward by playing with Sheva (evident in Treviso game, be patient) and acquire a younger striker, like Tavano or Bonazolli. Forget spendig 10 mil euros on Crespo and by a couple of defenders like Chivu, Bovo, Bonera, Barzagli etc.

Good points guys, but I am not necessarily saying that we should buy Crespo now, just that we should never have let him go in the 1st place. He wanted to stay in Milan, but apparently he wasn't offered an extension by Galliani and the gang so he had no choice but to go back to Chelsea. I was very sad to see him go, as he was working well with Sheva and Kaka. I think this season he would have played better than Gila, and once again I am not saying that I do not like Gila. Its just that Crespo is more experienced and he could have been more consistent in some of the games (remember when Gila missed 3 golden opportunities in one half and only Pippo bailed us out in the 94th minute)

BTW The question asks do we want Crespo back, and I answered yes. The queston does not sak should we BUY Crespo back, in that case I woul have most likely answered .

The future is looking at us just around the corner, 918...

Originally Posted by GRE-NO-LI

The future is looking at us just around the corner, 918...

I sure hope so
BTW, what is that on your avatar?

Well, it's very polemical stuff: that's the symbol of Hizbollah.